首页|全身免疫炎症指数预测急性脑梗死溶栓患者短期功能预后价值研究

全身免疫炎症指数预测急性脑梗死溶栓患者短期功能预后价值研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨全身免疫炎症指数(systemic immune-inflammation index,SII)对急性脑梗死溶栓患者短期功能预后的预测价值.方法 回顾性收集2022年1月至2023年12月在无锡市锡山人民医院神经内科住院且发病4.5小时内接受阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗的急性脑梗死患者作为研究对象,并整理相关的临床资料.根据出院时改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分,将所有入组患者分为预后良好组(mRS≤2分)和预后不良组(mRS>2分),记录两组患者基线(溶栓前)和溶栓后24小时内的中性粒细胞、血小板、淋巴细胞计数等指标变化,得出SII结果,用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估SII预测急性脑梗死溶栓患者短期预后的价值.结果 本课题共纳入研究对象174例,其中预后良好组127例,预后不良组47例.与预后良好组相比,预后不良组房颤、高血压、出血比例更高,年龄、溶栓前后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分(NIH-SS)、基线收缩压、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、D-二聚体水平在预后不良组明显高于预后良好组(P<0.05),两组基线SII比较无统计学差异(P=0.268),两组溶栓后24小时SII比较,预后不良组溶栓后SII水平明显高于预后良好组(P<0.001).ROC曲线分析示溶栓后SII是急性脑梗死患者预后不良的独立影响因素之一,最佳截断值为753.68,曲线下面积为0.821(95%CI 0.746~0.896,P<0.01),最大约登指数为0.620,敏感度为87.2%,特异度为74.8%,溶栓后NIHSS评分及与溶栓后SII两项指标联合预测AIS溶栓患者不良预后的曲线下面积分别为0.894与0.945,敏感度分别为78.7%与93.6%;特异度分别为87.4%与88.2%.结论 溶栓后SII升高与急性脑梗死静脉溶栓患者短期不良预后相关,溶栓后24小时内动态监测SII对急性脑梗死患者短期功能预后有一定预测价值.
Study on the value of systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting short-term functional prognosis of patients with a-cute cerebral infarction
Objective To investigate the value of systemic immune-inflammation index(SII)in predicting short-term functional prognosis of acute cerebral infarction patients with thrombolysis.Methods Patients with acute cerebral infarction who were hospital-ized in the Department of Neurology,Xishan People's Hospital of Wuxi from January 2022 to December 2023 and received intrave-nous thrombolytic therapy with Alteplase(rt-PA)within 4.5 hours of onset were retrospectively collected as the study objects,and the relevant clinical data were collated.According to the modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score at discharge,all enrolled patients were di-vided into the good prognosis group(mRS ≤2 points)and the poor prognosis group(mRS>2 points).The changes of neutrophils,platelets,lymphocytes and other indicators in the baseline(before thrombolysis)and 24 hours after thrombolysis of patients in the two groups were recorded,and SII results were obtained.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curves were used to evaluate the value of SII in predicting short-term prognosis of thrombolysis patients with acute cerebral infarction.Results A total of 174 subjects were included in this study,including 127 in the good prognosis group and 47 in the poor prognosis group.Compared with the good progno-sis group,the proportion of atrial fibrillation,hypertension and hemorrhage in the poor prognosis group was higher.Age,National Insti-tutes of Health Stroke Scale score(NIHSS)before and after thrombolysis,baseline systolic blood pressure,fasting blood glucose,gly-cated hemoglobin and D-dimer levels in the poor prognosis group were significantly higher than those in the good prognosis group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in baseline SII between the two groups(P=0.268).The level of SII in the poor prognosis group was significantly higher than that in the good prognosis group at 24 hours after thrombolysis(P<0.001).ROC curve analysis showed that SII after thrombolysis was one of the independent influencing factors for poor prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction.The optimal cut-off value was 753.68,the area under the curve was 0.821(95%CI 0.746~0.896,P<0.01),the maximum approximate entry index was 0.620,the sensitivity was 87.2%,and the specificity was 74.8%.The area under the curve of post-thrombolytic NIHSS score and combined with post-thrombolytic SII were 0.894 and 0.945,respectively,and the sensi-tivity were 78.7%and 93.6%,respectively.The specificity was 87.4%and 88.2%,respectively.Conclusion The increase of SII after thrombolysis is associated with poor short-term prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction.Dynamic monitoring of SII within 24 hours after thrombolysis has certain predictive value for short-term functional prognosis in patients with acute cerebral in-farction.

acute cerebral infarctionintravenous thrombolysissystemic immune-inflammatory indexprognosis

陈梦婷、华键、陆云南、朱晓华

展开 >

无锡市锡山人民医院神经内科 214105

急性脑梗死 静脉溶栓 全身免疫炎症指数 预后

2024

中国老年保健医学
中国老年保健医学研究会

中国老年保健医学

影响因子:0.637
ISSN:1672-4860
年,卷(期):2024.22(4)