首页|经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生患者的效果比较

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生患者的效果比较

扫码查看
目的:比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(TUPKP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的效果.方法:选取 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月该院收治的 74 例BPH患者进行前瞻性研究,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组各37例.观察组采用TUPKP治疗,对照组采用TURP治疗,比较两组手术相关指标水平、手术前后疾病相关指标[前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺素E2(PGE2)]水平、尿流动力学指标[膀胱顺应性(BC)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)]水平、前列腺症状[国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)]和术后并发症发生率.结果:观察组手术时间、导管留置时间、膀胱冲洗时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 7 d,两组PSA、PGE2 水平均低于术前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 3 个月,两组BC、Qmax水平均高于术前,且观察组高于对照组,两组PVR水平均低于术前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组IPSS评分均低于术前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:TUPKP治疗BPH患者可降低手术相关指标、疾病相关指标水平和前列腺症状评分,改善尿流动力学指标水平,其效果优于TURP治疗.
Comparison of effects of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate in treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Objective:To compare the effect of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(TUPKP)and transurethral resection of prostate(TURP)in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 74 BPH patients admitted to this hospital from January 2020 to February 2023.They were divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method,37 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with TUPKP,while the control group was treated with TURP.The surgery-related indicator levels,the disease-related indicator levels[prostate specific antigen(PSA),prostaglandin E2(PGE2)]before and after the surgery,the urodynamic indicator levels[bladder compliance(BC),maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax),residual urine volume(PVR)],the prostate symptoms[International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS)],and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time,the catheter indwelling time,the bladder irrigation time and the hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Seven days after the surgery,the levels of PSA and PGE2 in the two groups were lower than those before the surgery,those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Three months after the surgery,the levels of BC and Qmax in the two groups were higher than those before the surgery,and those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group;the levels of PVR in the two groups were lower than those before the surgery,and that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group;and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The IPSS scores of the two groups were lower than those before the surgery,that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:TUPKP in the treatment of the BPH patients can reduce surgery-related indicator levels,the disease-related indicator levels and the prostate symptom scores,and improve the levels of urodynamic indicators.Moreover,it is superior to the TURP treatment.

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaTransurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostateTransurethral resection of prostateUrodynamicsInternational Prostate Symptom ScoreComplication

郑宇皓

展开 >

商丘市第四人民医院泌尿外科,河南 商丘 476000

良性前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术 经尿道前列腺电切术 尿流动力学 国际前列腺症状评分 并发症

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(2)
  • 12