首页|人工髋关节置换术与股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果比较

人工髋关节置换术与股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果比较

扫码查看
目的:比较人工髋关节置换术(THA)与股骨近端髓内钉内固定术(PFNA)治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折(IFF)患者的效果.方法:选取2021年1月至2023年1月该院收治的60例高龄IFF患者进行前瞻性研究,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组各30例.对照组采用PFNA治疗,观察组采用THA治疗,比较两组临床疗效、手术相关指标水平、手术前后疼痛程度[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、髋关节功能(Harris评分)和并发症发生率.结果:观察组治疗优良率为 90.00%(27/30),高于对照组的 60.00%(18/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组手术时间、术后卧床时间、开始负重行走时间均短于对照组,术中出血量、术后引流量均大于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 7 d,两组VAS评分均低于术前,且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 1、3、6 个月,两组Harris评分均高于术前,且观察组均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:THA治疗高龄IFF患者可提高治疗优良率和Harris评分,改善手术相关指标水平,降低VAS评分,效果优于PFNA治疗,但术中出血量多于PFNA治疗.
Comparison of effects of artificial hip replacement and proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures
Objective:To compare effects of artificial hip replacement(THA)and proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation(PFNA)in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures(IFF).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 60 elderly patients with IFF admitted to this hospital from January 2021 to January 2023.According to the random number table method,they were divided into control group and observation group,30 cases in each group.The control group was treated with PFNA,while the observation group was treated with THA.The clinical efficacy,the surgical related index levels,the pain degree[visual analogue scale(VAS)]scores before and after surgery,the hip function(Harris score),and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate of treatment in the observation group was 90.00%(27/30),which was higher than 60.00%(18/30)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The operation time,the postoperative bed time and the start time of weight-bearing walk time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,the intraoperative blood loss and the postoperative drainage volume were greater than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Seven days after the surgery,the VAS scores of the two groups were lower than those before the surgery,that in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).At 1,3 and 6 months after the surgery,the Harris scores of the two groups were higher than those before the surgery,those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:THA in the treatment of the elderly patients with IFF can improve the excellent and good rate of treatment and the Harris scores,improve the levels of operation-related indicators,and reduce the VAS scores.It is superior to PFNA treatment,but the intraoperative blood loss is more than that of PFNA treatment.

ElderlyIntertrochanteric femoral fractureArtificial hip replacementProximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixationPainHip joint function

吴江望

展开 >

鄱阳湖第二医院骨科,江西 上饶 333100

高龄 股骨粗隆间骨折 人工髋关节置换术 股骨近端髓内钉内固定术 疼痛 髋关节功能

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(6)
  • 15