首页|髋关节囊周围神经阻滞复合静脉全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术患者中的应用效果

髋关节囊周围神经阻滞复合静脉全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术患者中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的:观察髋关节囊周围神经阻滞(PENGB)复合静脉全身麻醉在全髋关节置换术患者中的应用效果.方法:回顾性分析 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 7 月于该院行全髋关节置换术的 96 例患者的临床资料,按照麻醉方式不同将其分为观察组和对照组各 48 例.观察组于麻醉诱导前行PENGB,对照组于麻醉诱导前行髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB),阻滞完成后两组均行静脉全身麻醉.比较两组麻醉相关指标(神经阻滞操作时间、瑞芬太尼用量、丙泊酚用量)水平、不同时间(阻滞前和阻滞后 10、30、60 min)血流动力学指标(平均动脉压、心率)水平、术后不同时间(术后 1、3、6 h)疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、下肢运动阻滞程度(改良Bromage评分),以及不良反应发生率.结果:两组瑞芬太尼、丙泊酚用量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组神经阻滞操作时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);阻滞后10、30、60 min,观察组平均动脉压、心率水平均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3、6 h,观察组VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 1、3、6 h,观察组改良Bromage评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:PENGB复合静脉全身麻醉应用于全髋关节置换术患者可缩短神经阻滞操作时间,稳定血流动力学指标水平,降低术后疼痛评分和下肢运动阻滞评分,效果优于FICB复合静脉全身麻醉.
Application effects of peripheral nerve block of hip joint capsule combined with intravenous general anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty
Objective:To observe application effects of peripheral nerve block of hip joint capsule(PENGB)combined with intravenous general anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.Methods:The clinical data of 96 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in this hospital from August 2022 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different anesthesia methods,they were divided into observation group and control group,48 cases in each group.The observation group received PENGB before anesthesia induction,while the control group received fascia iliac compartment block(FICB)before anesthesia induction.After the block was completed,both groups underwent intravenous general anesthesia.The anesthesia related indexes(nerve block operation time,Remifentanil dosage,Propofol dosage)levels,the hemodynamic indexes(mean arterial pressure,heart rate)levels at different times(before block and 10,30,60 min after block),the pain[visual analogue scale(VAS)]scores at different times after the surgery(1,3,6 h after the surgery),the lower limb motor block(modified Bromage score)score,and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the dosage of Remifentanil and Propofol between the two groups(P>0.05).The nerve block operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).10,30 and 60 min after block,the levels of mean arterial pressure and heart rate in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).3 and 6 h after the surgery,the VAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).1,3 and 6 h after the surgery,the modified Bromage score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:PENGB combined with intravenous general anesthesia in the patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty can shorten the nerve block operation time,stabilize the levels of hemodynamic indexes,and reduce the postoperative pain scores and the lower limb motor block scores.Moreover,it is superior to FICB combined with intravenous general anesthesia.

Peripheral nerve block of hip joint capsuleFascia iliac compartment blockTotal hip arthroplastyHemodynamicsPainAdverse reaction

吴蓓蓓

展开 >

信阳市第三人民医院手术麻醉科,河南 信阳 464000

髋关节囊周围神经阻滞 髂筋膜间隙阻滞 全髋关节置换术 血流动力学 疼痛 不良反应

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(9)
  • 11