首页|股骨近端髓内钉内固定术与髋关节置换术治疗髋部骨折患者的效果比较

股骨近端髓内钉内固定术与髋关节置换术治疗髋部骨折患者的效果比较

扫码查看
目的:比较股骨近端髓内钉内固定术与髋关节置换术治疗髋部骨折患者的效果.方法:回顾性分析 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年7 月该院收治的 90 例髋部骨折患者的临床资料,按照手术方法不同将其分为观察组和对照组各 45 例.对照组行髋关节置换术治疗,观察组行股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗.比较两组围术期指标(手术时间、术中出血量、骨折痊愈时间、术后住院时间)水平,手术前后疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)]评分、髋关节功能[Harris髋关节功能量表(HHS)]评分、骨代谢指标[骨钙素(BGP)、骨保护素(OPG)、骨密度(BMD)]水平,以及并发症发生率.结果:观察组手术时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 3、7 d,观察组VAS评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 1、3 个月,观察组HSS评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后 3 个月,观察组BGP、OPG、BMD水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组骨折愈合时间、术后住院时间、并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:股骨近端髓内钉内固定术治疗髋部骨折患者可缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量,降低术后疼痛评分,提高术后髋关节功能评分,效果优于髋关节置换术治疗,但对骨代谢指标的改善效果不及髋关节置换术.
Comparison of effects of proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation and hip replacement in treatment of patients with hip fracture
Objective:To compare effects of proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation and hip replacement in treatment of patients with hip fracture.Methods:The clinical data of 90 patients with hip fracture admitted to this hospital from January 2021 to July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into observation group and control group according to different surgical methods,45 cases in each group.The control group was treated with hip replacement,while the observation group was treated with proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation.The perioperative indexes(operation time,intraoperative blood loss,fracture healing time,postoperative hospitalization time)levels,the pain[visual analogue scale(VAS)]score,the hip joint function[Harris hip scale(HHS)]score,the bone metabolism index[osteocalcin(BGP),osteoprotegerin(OPG),bone mineral density(BMD)]levels,and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups before and after the surgery.Results:The operation time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).3 and 7 days after the surgery,the VAS scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).1 and 3 months after the surgery,the HSS scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).3 months after the surgery,the levels of BGP,OPG and BMD in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences in fracture healing time,postoperative hospitalization time and complication rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of the patients with hip fracture can shorten the operation time,reduce the intraoperative blood loss,reduce the postoperative pain scores,and improve the postoperative hip function scores.It is superior to hip replacement,but the improvement of bone metabolism index is not as good as that of hip replacement.

Proximal femoral intramedullary nail internal fixationHip replacementHip fracturePainHip joint functionBone metabolismComplication

吕花成、张荣方、吕花会、梁雄飞、向旭阳

展开 >

南阳市中医院,下肢创伤科,河南 南阳 473000

南阳市中医院,运动医学科,河南 南阳 473000

南阳市中医院,康复医学科,河南 南阳 473000

南阳市中医院,脊柱微创科,河南 南阳 473000

展开 >

股骨近端髓内钉内固定术 髋关节置换术 髋部骨折 疼痛 髋关节功能 骨代谢 并发症

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(12)
  • 10