首页|环泊酚与丙泊酚麻醉在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果比较

环泊酚与丙泊酚麻醉在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果比较

扫码查看
目的:比较环泊酚与丙泊酚麻醉在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果.方法:选取 2023 年 6-12 月于该院行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 80 例老年患者进行前瞻性研究,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组和对照组各 40 例.观察组予以环泊酚麻醉诱导和维持,对照组予以丙泊酚麻醉诱导和维持.比较两组麻醉相关指标(麻醉诱导时间、麻醉苏醒时间、离开麻醉恢复室时间)水平,不同时间[麻醉诱导前(T0)、诱导后3 min(T1)、进镜时(T2)、术毕(T3)]血流动力学指标(心率、中心静脉压、血氧饱和度)水平、不同时间(术始 10、30 min和术毕)镇静(Ramsay评分法)评分,以及不良反应发生率.结果:两组麻醉苏醒时间、离开麻醉恢复室时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组麻醉诱导时间长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T1、T2、T3 时,两组心率、中心静脉压、血氧饱和度均低于T0 时,但观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术始 10、30 min和术毕时,两组Ramsay评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组低血压、恶心呕吐发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组注射痛发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:环泊酚麻醉应用于老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术可稳定血流动力学指标水平,降低注射痛发生率,效果优于丙泊酚麻醉,但需延长麻醉诱导时间.
Comparison of application effects of Ciprofol and Propofol anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients
Objective:To compare application effects of Ciprofol and Propofol anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 80 elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this hospital from June to December 2023.According to the random number table method,they were divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each group.The observation group was induced and maintained by Ciprofol anesthesia,while the control group was induced and maintained by Propofol anesthesia.The levels of anesthesia-related indicators(anesthesia induction time,anesthesia recovery time,and time to leave the anesthesia recovery room),the hemodynamic indicators(heart rate,central venous pressure,and blood oxygen saturation)levels at different times[before anesthesia induction(T0),3 min after induction(T1),at the time of entering endoscope(T2),and at the end of surgery(T3)],the sedation(Ramsay score)scores at different times(10,30 min before surgery and at the end of surgery),and the incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the anesthesia recovery time and the time to leave the anesthesia recovery room between the two groups(P>0.05).The anesthesia induction time in the observation group was longer than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At T1,T2 and T3,the levels of heart rate,central venous pressure and blood oxygen saturation in the two groups were lower than those at T0,but those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the Ramsay scores between the two groups 10,30 min after the surgery and at the end of the surgery(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension,nausea and vomiting between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of injection pain in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:Ciprofol anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly patients can stabilize the levels of hemodynamic indicators and reduce the incidence of injection pain.It is superior to Propofol anesthesia,but the anesthesia induction time needs to be prolonged.

CiprofolPropofolLaparoscopic cholecystectomyElderlyAnesthesiaHemodynamicsSedation

谷晶晶、刘珊珊、吴冬良、李凯辉

展开 >

厦门大学附属成功医院麻醉科,福建 厦门 361001

环泊酚 丙泊酚 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 老年 麻醉 血流动力学 镇静

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(15)
  • 7