首页|临床护理路径在急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓患者中的应用效果

临床护理路径在急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓患者中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的:观察临床护理路径在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)静脉溶栓患者中的应用效果.方法:回顾性分析2020年2月至2022年2 月在该院行静脉溶栓治疗的 60 例AIS患者的临床资料,根据护理方法不同将其分为对照组与观察组各 30 例.对照组实施常规护理,观察组实施基于临床护理路径的溶栓护理.比较两组急救效率(急诊科停留时间、入院至CT检查时间及入院至溶栓时间)、溶栓前后神经功能缺损程度[美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)]评分、溶栓成功率、不良事件发生率及生活自理能力[改良Barthel指数(MBI)]评分.结果:观察组急诊科停留时间、入院至CT检查时间及入院至溶栓时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);溶栓 24 h后,观察组NIHSS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组溶栓成功率为 93.33%(28/30),高于对照组的 73.33%(22/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组不良事件发生率为 10.00%(3/30),低于对照组的 36.67%(11/30),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组MBI评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:临床护理路径用于静脉溶栓治疗的AIS患者中效果确切,可缩短急诊科停留时间、入院至CT检查时间及入院至溶栓时间,提高患者神经功能和溶栓成功率,降低不良事件发生率,改善其生活自理能力,效果优于常规护理.
Application effects of clinical nursing pathway in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis
Objective:To observe application effects of clinical nursing pathway in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS)undergoing intravenous thrombolysis.Methods:The clinical data of 60 patients with AIS who underwent intravenous thrombolysis in the hospital from February 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the different nursing methods,they were divided into control group and observation group,30 cases in each group.The control group was given routine nursing,while the observation group was given the thrombolysis nursing based on the clinical nursing pathway.The emergency efficiency(emergency department stay time,admission to CT examination time and admission to thrombolysis time),the neurological deficit scores[National Institutes of Health stroke scale(NIHSS)]before and after thrombolysis,the success rate of thrombolysis,the incidence of adverse events,and the self-care ability[modified Barthel index(MBI)]score were compared between the two groups.Results:The emergency department stay time,the admission to CT examination time and the admission to thrombolysis time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 24 hours of thrombolysis,the NIHSS score of the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The success rate of thrombolysis in the observation group was 93.33%(28/30),which was higher than 73.33%(22/30)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was 10.00%(3/30),which was lower than 36.67%(11/30)in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Further,the MBI score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions:The clinical nursing pathway is effective for the AIS patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis.It can shorten the emergency department stay time,the admission to CT examination time and the admission to thrombolysis time to thrombolysis,improve the neurological function and the success rate of thrombolysis,reduce the incidence of adverse events,and improve the f self-care ability.Moreover,it is superior to the routine nursing.

Intravenous thrombolysisAcute ischemic strokeClinical nursing pathwayEmergencyComplication

王琴、欧阳淑

展开 >

湖口县人民医院内一科,江西 九江 332500

静脉溶栓 急性缺血性卒中 临床护理路径 急救 并发症

2024

中国民康医学
中国社会工作协会

中国民康医学

影响因子:0.649
ISSN:1672-0369
年,卷(期):2024.36(16)