中国男科学杂志2024,Vol.38Issue(1) :120-123.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2024.01.018

比较教学联合LBL教学模式在勃起功能障碍规范化诊治教学中的应用及效果评价

Application and effectiveness evaluation of comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode in standardized diagnosis and treatment teaching of erectile dysfunction

高晶晶 张子房 杜俊华 高攀 彭党委 张耀 张贤生
中国男科学杂志2024,Vol.38Issue(1) :120-123.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2024.01.018

比较教学联合LBL教学模式在勃起功能障碍规范化诊治教学中的应用及效果评价

Application and effectiveness evaluation of comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode in standardized diagnosis and treatment teaching of erectile dysfunction

高晶晶 1张子房 1杜俊华 1高攀 1彭党委 1张耀 1张贤生1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院(安徽 合肥 230022)
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 比较和分析比较教学联合基础的教学学习(LBL)的综合教学模式与LBL模式的教学效果.方法 研究对象来自于参加2018至2020年安徽省男科疾病规范化诊治菁英医师班的学员.将学员随机分为比较教学联合LBL教学组和LBL教学组.两组学员在接受所有勃起功能障碍(ED)诊疗规范化培训后,均通过连续短期临床评估方法(Mini-CEX)对教学效果进行评估,同时学员通过问卷形式反馈所接受教学模式的意见.结果 比较教学联合LBL教学组共28名学员,LBL教学组27名学员.除组织能力维度外,比较教学联合LBL教学组在Mini-CEX考核各子维度的得分较LBL教学组显著提高(P<0.05).在教学模式反馈结果方面,比较教学联合LBL教学组优于LBL教学组.比较教学联合LBL教学组可以显著提升知识点的理解与临床实践能力(P<0.05).结论 联合LBL的比较教学在对男科医师的ED诊疗规范化培养中效果优于LBL教学.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the teaching effects of comparative teaching combined with lecture-based learning(LBL)teaching mode and LBL mode alone.Methods The physicians who participated in the standardized diagnosis and treatment class of andrology diseases in Anhui Province from 2018 to 2020 were taken as the study subjects.The participators were randomly divided into the combined LBL teaching group and the LBL teaching group.After the training course was completed,the teaching effectiveness of the two groups of the participators was evaluated using the continuous mini clinical evaluation method(Mini-CEX),and questionnaire feedback.Results There were 28 students in the combined LBL teaching group and 27 students in the LBL teaching group.Except for the score of organizational ability dimension,the scores of other dimension parameters in the Mini-CEX assessment in the combined LBL teaching group were all increased significantly compared with those in the LBL teaching group(P<0.05).The results of questionnaire feedback showed that the teaching effectiveness of the combined LBL teaching group was superior to that of the LBL teaching group.The comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode significantly improved the understanding of knowledge points and clinical practice ability on andrology disease(P<0.05).Conclusion The comparative teaching combined with LBL teaching mode is better than LBL teaching mode in the standardized training on the diagnosis and treatment of ED.

关键词

教学方法/勃起功能障碍/规范化诊治

Key words

teaching methods/erectile dysfunction/standardized diagnosis and treatment

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国男科学杂志
上海交通大学医学院,国家人口和计划生育委员会科学技术研究所

中国男科学杂志

CSTPCDCSCD
影响因子:0.437
ISSN:1008-0848
参考文献量8
段落导航相关论文