中国酿造2024,Vol.43Issue(2) :211-215.DOI:10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2024.02.032

不同发酵方式对酸豇豆品质的影响

Effects of different fermentation methods on the quality of sour cowpea

孙宇 周主贵 刘健 辛明 李昌宝 冯锦清 李杰民 李天宇 叶冬青 零东宁
中国酿造2024,Vol.43Issue(2) :211-215.DOI:10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2024.02.032

不同发酵方式对酸豇豆品质的影响

Effects of different fermentation methods on the quality of sour cowpea

孙宇 1周主贵 1刘健 2辛明 1李昌宝 1冯锦清 1李杰民 1李天宇 1叶冬青 1零东宁1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广西壮族自治区农业科学院农产品加工研究所,广西南宁 530007;广西壮族自治区农业科学院广西果蔬贮藏与加工新技术重点实验室,广西南宁 530007;广西壮族自治区农业科学院广西农产品贮藏保鲜与加工科技成果转化中试研究基地,广西南宁 530007
  • 2. 中国轻工业南宁设计工程有限公司,广西南宁 530012
  • 折叠

摘要

以新鲜豇豆为原料,采用自然发酵(CK组)、接种商业菌种(CS组)、接种自筛直投式菌剂(DVS组)3种方式发酵豇豆,测定发酵过程中发酵液的总酸、pH值及发酵成熟后豇豆的盐度、亚硝酸盐、氨基酸态氮、游离氨基酸、乳酸菌数、色差、感官品质、质构特性,分析发酵方式对酸豇豆品质的影响.结果表明,在发酵过程中,DVS组的总酸增长速度最快,在1~6 d均高于CS组、CK组;CS组、DVS组的pH值下降速率比CK组快,在7 d时CS组pH值最低,DVS组仅次于CS组;在发酵至第7天时,DVS组菌落总数分别比CK组、CS组高33.86%、42.31%.发酵成熟后,DVS组的盐度、亚硝酸盐、b*值最低,氨基酸态氮、游离氨基酸、乳酸菌数、感官评分、硬度、粘力、胶着性、咀嚼性最高,L*值、a*值、弹性与其他发酵方式无显著性差异(P>0.05).综合可知,DVS组不仅发酵启动快,且酸豇豆成品的综合品质更优.

Abstract

Fresh cowpeas(Vigna unguiculata(Linn.)Walp.)were fermented by three ways:spontaneous fermentation(CK group),inoculation of com-mercial strains(CS group),inoculation of self-screening direct vat set starter(DVS group).The total acidity,pH of the broth total during fermentation and salinity,nitrite,amino acid nitrogen,free amino acids,lactic acid bacteria count,color difference,sensory quality and textural characteristics of finished fermented cowpeas were determined,to analysis the effect of the fermentation methods on the quality of sour cowpeas.The results showed that during fermentation,the total acidity of DVS group increased faster than those in both CK and CS group from 1-6 d.The pH of CS and DVS group decreased faster than CK group and the CS group reached the lowest on 7 d,followed by DVS group.The total bacteria count in DVS group was 33.86%and 42.31%higher than that in CK and CS group respectively on 7 d.After fermentation,the DVS group had the lowest salinity,nitrite,b*values,and the highest amino acid nitrogen,free amino acids,lactic acid bacteria count,sensory score,hardness,viscosity,gelatinousness and chewi-ness,but L*values,a*values and elasticity were not significantly different from the other fermentation methods(P>0.05).By comprehensive anal-ysis,the DVS group not only had faster fermentation initiation and higher acid tolerance,but the finished product also had better overall quality.

关键词

酸豇豆/发酵方式/直投式菌剂/品质

Key words

sour cowpea/fermentation method/direct vat set starter/quality

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD23023014)

广西科技重大专项(桂科AA17204042)

广西农业科学院基本科研业务费项目(桂农科2021YT111)

广西农业科学院基本科研业务费项目(桂农科2022JM72)

广西农业科学院基本科研业务费项目(桂农科2021YT16)

广西农业科学院基本科研业务费项目(桂农科2021JM25)

科技先锋队"强农富民""六个一"专项行动(桂农科盟202315)

出版年

2024
中国酿造
中国调味品协会 北京食品科学研究院

中国酿造

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.759
ISSN:0254-5071
参考文献量38
段落导航相关论文