首页|基于经济利益的区域能耗责任研究

基于经济利益的区域能耗责任研究

扫码查看
我国区域间存在广泛而密切的经济关系.任何一个区域的能源消耗既满足了本地区的生产和生活需要,同时又支撑了其他地区的经济活动.科学、公平地核算区域能耗责任不仅有助于识别各区域对全国能耗的贡献,也有利于制定有效的跨区域能源政策.由于各类经济主体使用能源的动机是为了获得各种经济利益,因此利益原则被普遍认为是能耗责任核算的基本原则.不过,利益原则的具体含义并不是单一的.根据经济利益的类型,利益原则可区分为生产原则、收入原则、消费原则等三种基本原则及由它们衍生出来的收入加权原则、消费加权原则、综合利益原则及加权综合利益原则等四种共担责任原则.鉴于多区域投入产出(MRIO)模型是刻画各区域之间深刻的经济关联和各种经济利益的有力工具,本文基于MRRIO模型建立了各种利益原则下的区域能耗责任核算框架,并将之用于分析中国的省际能源效率和能耗责任.结果表明:不同省份同一产业的能源效率差异显著.各省在不同原则下的能源效率和能耗责任也都具有显著差异.不过,不管采用哪种原则,传统能源密集型产业比重较大的省份(如宁夏、贵州、青海、山西和内蒙古)总是具有较低的能源效率,而一些沿海省份(如浙江、北京、广东、上海、江苏等)的能源效率总是较高同时,经济规模较大的省份(如广东、江苏、山东)总是具有较大的能耗责任,而经济规模较小的省份(如海南、宁夏、青海)总是具有较小的能耗责任.这些发现具有丰富的政策含义:①宁夏、贵州、青海、山西、内蒙古、新疆、甘肃和云南等能源密集型产业比重较大的省份,以及河北、湖北、湖南、广西等生产责任大于其他责任的省份,其节能的重点在于优化生产方式.②北京、天津、吉林、上海、江苏、浙江、安徽、福建、江西、广东、重庆、四川等消费责任或消费加权责任相对于其他责任较大的省份,其节能政策重点在于优化消费模式并尽可能从能源效率更高的地区调入同类产品.③黑龙江、海南、山东、陕西、辽宁、河南等收入责任或收入加权责任相对其他责任较大的地区,应在积极优化生产方式的同时更多的向能源效率更高的地区调出产品 当然,无论那个区域的节能战略都应包含生产、流通、消费等多个领域的措施,只不过它们的侧重点不同而己.同时,我国还需要努力打破地方贸易壁垒,形成统一的国内市场,使各地区能通过公平竞争充分发挥自己的比较优势,促进跨区域的产业结构优化.
Research on Benefit-based Regional Energy Consumption Responsibility
There are common and deep economic relationships between regions in China,thus the energy consumption of each region not only satisfies the requirement of production and consumption in each region but also supports economic activities in other regions.Scientifically and fairly accounting regional responsibility for energy consumption is not only helpful for identifying the contributions of each region to total energy consumption in China but also useful for designing efficient inter-regional energy policies.Because motivations of various economic agents consuming energy consumption are acquiring various kinds of benefit,the benefit principle is commonly regarded as the basic principle of accounting responsibility for energy consumption.However,the specific meaning of benefit principle is not single.According to the types of benefit,the benefit principle can be categorized as three primary principles,including the production principle,the income principle and the consumption principle,and four shared responsibility principles,including the income weighted principle,the consumption weighted principle,the comprehensive principle and the weighted comprehensive principles,which are derived from the primary principles.Considering that the multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model is a powerful tool for describing the deeply economic relationship between regions and various kinds of benefit,this paper proposes a framework for accounting responsibility for energy consumption at the regional level according to various benefit principles,using the MRIO model,and applies it to analyze the energy efficiency and responsibility for energy consumption at the provincial level in China.The results indicate that the energy efficiencies of the same sector in different provinces are significantly different from each other.For each province,its efficiencies and responsibilities under different principles are significantly different for each other.However,the energy efficiencies of provinces (such as Ningxia,Guizhou,Qinghai,Shanxi and Inner Mongolia) with high proportions of classical energy intensive industries are always ranked lower,whereas the efficiencies of coastal provinces (such as Zhejiang,Beijing,Guangdong,Shanghai and Jiangsu) are always ranked higher,irrespective to the principles.At the same time,the responsibilities of provinces with larger economic sizes (such as Guangdong,Jiangsu and Shandong) are always very large,whereas those of provinces with smaller economic sizes (such as Hainan,Ningxia and Qinghai) are always very small.These findings have abundant policy implications.First,the key point of energy conservation for those regions with higher share of intensive industries,including Ningxia,Guizhou,Qinghai,Shanxi,Inner Mongolia,Xinjiang,Gansu and Yunnan,and the provinces whose production responsibilities are higher than their other responsibilities,including Hebei,Hubei,Hunan and Guangxi,is optimize the mode of production.Second,the major policy for energy conservation in those provinces.whose consumption or consumption weighted responsibilities are higher than their other responsibilities,including Beijing,Tianjin,Jilin,Shanghai,Jiangsu,Zhejiang,Anhui,Fujian,Jiangxi,Guangdong,Chongqing and Sichuan,is optimizing consumption pattern and purchasing products from regions with higher energy efficiency as far as possible.Third,the regions whose income or income weighted responsibilities are higher than their other responsibilities,including Heilongjiang,Hainan,Shandong,Shanxi,Liaoning and Henan,should optimize the mode of production as well as sell more products to regions with higher energy efficiency.But of course the energy conservation strategies of each region should cover measures including production,selling and consumption,and they just emphasize different areas.At the same time,China should make efforts to break the regional trade barrier to build a uniform domestic market,enable each province to exert their comparative advantages through fair competition and promote industrial structure optimization across regions.

regional energy consumption responsibilityregional energy efficiencybenefit principlemulti-regional input-output model

张友国

展开 >

中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所,北京100732

中国社会科学院环境与发展研究中心,北京100732

区域能耗责任 区域能源效率 利益原则 多区域投入产出模型

中国社会科学院哲学社会科学创新工程项目国家社会科学基金中国社会科学院数量经济与技术经济研究所重点课题

13CJY009

2014

中国人口·资源与环境
中国可持续发展研究会 山东省可持续发展中心 中国21世纪议程管理中心 山东师范大学

中国人口·资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCICSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.126
ISSN:1002-2104
年,卷(期):2014.24(9)
  • 4
  • 1