首页|碳排放交易体系的构建、挑战与市场拓展

碳排放交易体系的构建、挑战与市场拓展

扫码查看
碳排放权通过市场交易实现效率配置,有理论与实践支撑.“碳排放”作为一种“恶品”,需要不断压缩或定额管控,与“善品”有着本质不同.因而,“碳排放”市场交易有着固有的困境.在国内碳市场构建中,困境还会得到强化.因为,①中国与国际社会、中央与地方、地方之间、政府与企业存在多重博弈,受经济、政治、环境、社会多重因素的制约,排放总量的确定和分配具有潜在的不确定性.②“碳”的核算从属于能源,并不完全独立,是一种具有被动属性的交易品,企业的选择与能效和节能关联,则“用能权”和“碳排放权”重叠.由于碳作为交易品的从属和被动属性,企业的经营决策的碳约束可能被弱化或边缘化,对消费者的价格信号部分失真.③开放的、竞争的市场才是有效率的.但是从欧盟的碳排放贸易体系和国内的试点看,这一系统则是相对封闭的.④如果说高碳产品低品质可以通过市场的自我调节而对企业有所约束,而城市基础设施锁定的碳,其成本只能由全社会担承,在碳排放交易体系中得不到实际体现.⑤用能权和碳排放权有可能一体兼容,但是,碳交易的市场激励传递受到一些体制性因素的约束而失效.因此,中国的碳交易体系构建,需要在顶层设计中考虑碳排放的属性特点,拓展碳排放交易的市场空间.首先,在认知上将“碳交易”从约束变为一种机遇.其次,国家需要将碳纳入预算管理,实现效率配置和有效管控.再次,建立发展导向的碳交易市场,拓展碳市场规模.如纳入森林碳汇,碳市场与生态补偿相关联.最后,鼓励净零碳城市建设.
Construction, challenges and market expansion of emissions trading system
Carbon emission entitlements can achieve allocative efficiency through market transactions,which has both theoretical ground and practical support.Carbon emissions,as a kind of bads,need to be continuously compressed or controlled by quota,which is essentially different from any sort of ‘ goods ’.Therefore,there are inherent difficulties in the market transactions of carbon emissions.During the construction of domestic carbon market,such a situation will deteriorate.Firstly,it is because that constrained by overlapping factors of economy,politics,environment and society,multiple and complicate checks and balances exist between China and international community,between central and local governments,among local governments and between governments and enterprises,leading to potential uncertainty about the identification and distribution of total emissions.Secondly,the carbon accounting is subject to energy sector and it is not completely independent as a passive commodity.If the choice of an enterprise is connected to its energy efficiency and energy conservation,then the energy use entitlements overlap with carbon emission entitlements.Due to the subordinate and passive attribute of carbon as a commodity,the carbon constraint on the decision making of enterprises may be weakened or marginalized,and thus its price signal to customers would be partly distorted.Thirdly,only an open and competitive market is an efficient one,but judging from the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and domestic pilot projects,this system is relatively closed.Fourthly,the low quality of carbon-intensive products may impose some constraint on enterprises through selfregulation;but for the carbon locked-in physical infrastructure,its cost can only be borne by the whole society and would fail to be actually reflected in emissions trading system.Fifthly,the energy use entitlements and carbon emissions entitlements may be compatible and integrated with each other;however,the passing-on of incentives in a carbon trading market may cease to have any effect because of some institutional constraints.Therefore,China needs to take into account the attributes and features of carbon emissions in the top-level design and expand the market space for emissions trading during its construction of carbon trading system.First and foremost,China should shift the attitude towards carbon trading from a constraint to an opportunity.Secondly,carbon should be budgeted to achieve allocative efficiency and effective control.Furthermore,the country needs to establish a development-oriented carbon trading market to expand the market size and take measures such as including forests carbon sinks and linking carbon market to ecological compensation.Finally,construction of net zero-carbon cities should be encouraged.

carbon emissions tradingmarket spaceParis Agreementchallengescountermeasures

潘家华

展开 >

中国社会科学院城市发展与环境研究所/生态文明研究智库,北京100081

碳排放交易 市场空间 巴黎协定 挑战 对策

国家自然科学基金

批准号:71273275

2016

中国人口·资源与环境
中国可持续发展研究会 山东省可持续发展中心 中国21世纪议程管理中心 山东师范大学

中国人口·资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCICSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.126
ISSN:1002-2104
年,卷(期):2016.26(8)
  • 51
  • 11