首页|碳达峰背景下多种碳税返还原则的经济影响

碳达峰背景下多种碳税返还原则的经济影响

扫码查看
碳税收入使用是国家碳税制度设计的一项重要内容,采取不同碳税返还原则对国民经济以及碳减排效果的差异很大。该研究在碳达峰背景下以实现国家自主贡献目标为出发点设计了3种碳税返还原则的方案,包括依据产量占比返还、依据出口占比返还以及依据碳强度返还,并运用中国动态递推可计算一般均衡模型模拟了这三种税收返还原则下征收碳税引起的经济和环境影响。碳税返还措施可减缓征收碳税造成的经济损失,依据不同返还原则对结果影响很大:①依据产量占比返还原则经济损失最小,同时居民社会福利可得到提升。②依据碳强度返还原则能实现中国2030年碳强度比2005年降低65%以上、非化石能源占一次能源消费比重达到25%的目标,但依据该原则进行返还对减缓经济损失的作用较小。③依据出口占比返还原则能缩小中国产品与国际产品的竞争差距,且不会增加碳强度高的商品出口。④依据产量占比返还原则和出口占比返还原则无法实现2030年非化石能源占一次能源消费的比重达25%左右的目标,而只能实现单位国内生产总值CO2排放比2005年降低65%以上的国家自主贡献目标。总之,碳税作为中国实现碳达峰目标的重要选择和保障应尽快实施,同时,在健全碳税体系的基础上根据国情有针对性地选择碳税返还原则,充分发挥碳税在实现国家自主贡献目标中的作用。
Economic impact of several carbon tax recycling principles under China's goal of reaching peak carbon emissions
Recycling carbon tax revenue is a significant part of the design of a nation's carbon tax system.The impact of different recy-cling principles on the socio-economy and carbon emission reduction varies greatly.Under the background of China's goal of reaching peak carbon emissions,this paper designed three carbon tax recycling principles based on the goal of Nationally Determined Contribu-tions(NDCs),including recycling principles based on output ratio,export ratio,and carbon intensity.A recursively dynamic CGE model was developed in this study to evaluate the economic effects of these three carbon tax recycling principles based on tax neutrality under China's goal of reaching peak carbon emissions.Carbon tax recycling measures could mitigate the economic losses caused by carbon tax,and the results could be greatly affected according to different recycling principles.The results showed that:① The recycling prin-ciple based on output ratio could reduce economic losses and improve households' social welfare.② China's carbon intensity in 2030 could be reduced by more than 65%compared with that in 2005,and the proportion of non-fossil energy in primary energy consumption could reach 25%using the recycling principle based on carbon intensity,but the economic loss mitigation effect of the recycling mea-sures based on this principle was small.③ Adopting the recycling principle based on export ratio would narrow the competitive gap be-tween China and foreign countries,and the exports of high-carbon-intensity goods would not increase under this principle.④ According to principles based on output ratio and export ratio,the NDC goal of non-fossil energy accounting for about 25%of primary energy con-sumption by 2030 could not be achieved,and only the NDC goal of reducing carbon emissions per unit of GDP by more than 65%com-pared with that of 2005 could be achieved.In brief,as an essential policy tool to achieve China's goal of reaching peak carbon emis-sions,the carbon tax should be implemented as soon as possible.At the same time,according to China's national conditions,a targeted choice of carbon tax recycling principle is needed.The role of the carbon tax in the process of achieving the goal of Nationally Deter-mined Contributions should be fully utilized.

carbon taxpeak carbon emissionsCGE modelcarbon revenue recycling

常原华、李戈

展开 >

中国人民大学生态环境学院,北京 100872

碳税 碳达峰 CGE模型 碳税返还

2024

中国人口·资源与环境
中国可持续发展研究会 山东省可持续发展中心 中国21世纪议程管理中心 山东师范大学

中国人口·资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCI北大核心
影响因子:3.126
ISSN:1002-2104
年,卷(期):2024.34(4)
  • 42