首页|环境信用制度选择与绿色全要素生产率提升

环境信用制度选择与绿色全要素生产率提升

扫码查看
作为中国生态文明制度重要组成部分,环境信用制度内涵丰富,类型多样,是拥有强制型、选择型、引导型的制度工具。为推动提升绿色全要素生产率,环境信用制度选择面临困境。该研究基于2003—2021年数据,理论探讨影响环境信用制度的因素,分别以《企业环境信用评价办法(试行)》《绿色信贷指引》《环境信息公开办法(试行)》的出台实施构建环境信用监管制度、绿色信贷制度、环境信息披露制度准自然实验,采用空间倍差法分析环境信用制度与绿色全要素生产率关系。研究发现:①尽管单一型环境信用制度在一定程度提升绿色全要素生产率,但组合型环境信用制度未起到"1+1>2""1+1+1>3"效果。②影响环境信用制度的关键因素是内生交易成本,当内生交易成本过高时,环境信用制度"宁缺毋滥";当内生交易成本忽略不计时,环境信用制度"多多益善";当内生交易成本处于中间位置时,需要权衡选择单一或组合型环境信用制度。③信用环境是环境信用制度影响绿色全要素生产率的重要调节变量,法制环境对环境信用制度支撑力偏弱。加强法制、信用环境建设,降低制度运行成本,是释放环境信用制度潜力提升绿色全要素生产率的重要条件,应着眼制度替代加强环境信用制度选择,着眼制度互补加强环境信用制度耦合,着眼制度冲突加强环境信用制度协同,着眼制度空缺加强环境信用制度查漏补缺,着眼定性定量完善环境信用制度绩效评价。
Choice of environmental credit systems and improvement of green total factor productivity
As an important part of China's ecological civilization system,environmental credit systems are rich in content,with institu-tional tools having mandatory,selective,and guiding functions.Promoting green total factor productivity has met 'happy troubles' in the process of choosing environmental credit systems.Using the data from 2003 to 2021,this study theoretically explored the factors af-fecting environmental credit systems and constructed quasi-natural experiments of the environmental credit regulatory system,green credit system,and environmental information disclosure system based on the introduction and implementation of the Measures for Corpo-rate Environmental Credit Evaluation (Trial),Guidelines for Green Credit,and Measures for Disclosure of Environmental Information (Tri-al).It also analyzed the relationship between environmental credit systems and green total factor productivity with the spatial difference-in-differences model.It is found that:① Although a single environmental credit system enhanced green total factor productivity to a cer-tain extent,the combined environmental credit systems did not have the effect of '1+1>2' or '1+1+1>3.' ② The key factor affecting the environmental credit systems was the endogenous transaction cost.When the endogenous transaction cost was too high,it was better to have more environmental credit systems than less;when the endogenous transaction cost was negligible,the more environmental cred-it systems there were,the better;and when the endogenous transaction cost was in the middle,the choice of either a single type or a combination of different environmental credit systems was appropriate.③ The credit environment was an important moderator variable of environmental credit systems affecting green total factor productivity,and the support of the legal environment for environmental cred-it systems was weak.Therefore,strengthening the construction of the legal system and credit environment and reducing the operation cost of the system are important conditions for releasing the potential of environmental credit systems to enhance green total factor pro-ductivity.We should focus on system substitution to strengthen the choice of environmental credit systems,system complementarity to strengthen the coupling of environmental credit systems,system conflicts to strengthen the synergy of environmental credit systems,sys-tem vacancy to strengthen the checking and mending of environmental credit systems,and qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the performance of environmental credit systems.

environmental credit systemsgreen total factor productivityendogenous transaction costEBM Modelspatial difference-in-differences model

陈海盛、沈满洪

展开 >

浙江农林大学生态文明研究院,浙江杭州 311300

浙江省信用中心,浙江杭州 310007

浙江农林大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州 311300

环境信用制度 绿色全要素生产率 内生交易成本 EBM模型 空间倍差法

2024

中国人口·资源与环境
中国可持续发展研究会 山东省可持续发展中心 中国21世纪议程管理中心 山东师范大学

中国人口·资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCI北大核心
影响因子:3.126
ISSN:1002-2104
年,卷(期):2024.34(10)