首页|湖北省耕地"大占补"数量-质量平衡及其对粮食产能的影响

湖北省耕地"大占补"数量-质量平衡及其对粮食产能的影响

扫码查看
守好耕地数量、质量"双红线",将各类耕地占用统一纳入占补平衡管理,即由"小占补"拓展至"大占补",是中国耕地占补平衡制度的重大变革,事关国家粮食安全和民族永续发展。该研究提出了一个理论分析框架,以揭示"大占补"视阈下耕地在数量与质量双重维度上的占补平衡及其对粮食产能的影响;进而以湖北省为研究区域,基于2015—2020年数据,运用数理统计和空间分析方法进行了实证检验。结果显示:①在数量维度,3个耕地亚类中水田被占用的比重最高,且"非粮化"已超过"非农化",成为耕地占用的主要诱因;在质量维度,在自然等、利用等、经济等3个分等维度下,优等地与高等地的占用量占总占用量的比例均达75%以上,存在优质耕地占用量大的问题。②"小占补"实现了平衡,但"大占补"未能达到平衡。在数量维度,补充耕地面积与占用耕地面积间的缺口为1298。60 hm2,且存在占用水田而补充旱地现象;在质量维度,优等耕地在3个分等维度下均未能实现占补平衡。③相比占用耕地的重心而言,补充耕地的重心呈现向坡度更陡、高程更高的西北方向移动的特征,耕地存在一定的边际化利用风险。④在数量-质量复合维度下测度耕地占补平衡对粮食产能的影响揭示了"数量"单一维度占补平衡对粮食产能影响的低估,数量-质量复合维度损失的粮食产能比"数量"单一维度多660。62 t,数量-质量复合维度损失的粮食产能达到4302。27 t。研究提出,应通过强化耕地"非粮化"管控、确保后备耕地资源数量充足和质量有保障、实行耕地占补平衡倒逼机制等措施,推动落实面向"大占补"的耕地数量-质量双维平衡。
Quantity and quality balance of farmland in Hubei Province in the context of 'compensation for comprehensive occupation' and its impact on grain production capacity
Safeguarding the 'double red lines' of farmland quantity and quality and integrating various types of farmland occupation into the overall compensation management,extending 'compensation for built-up land occupation' to 'compensation for comprehensive occupation,' represents a milestone reform in China's farmland compensation system and is crucial for national food security and sus-tainable development.This study developed a theoretical framework to reveal the balance of farmland in both quantity and quality di-mensions under the 'compensation for comprehensive occupation' policy and its impact on grain production capacity.Hubei Province was used as the study area to conduct empirical analysis using mathematical statistics and spatial analysis methods.The results showed that from 2015 to 2020:① In terms of quantity,paddy fields had the highest proportion of occupation among the three subtypes of farm-land.The non-grain use of farmland surpassed the non-agriculture use of farmland,becoming the main cause of farmland occupation.In terms of quality,across the three classification dimensions of nature,utilization,and economy,the occupation of superior and higher-quality farmland accounted for more than 75% of the total,indicating a problem of large occupation of high-quality farmland.②'Com-pensation for built-up land occupation' achieved balance,but 'compensation for comprehensive occupation' failed.In terms of quanti-ty,the gap between compensated and occupied farmland was 1298.60 hectares,with the phenomenon of replacing paddy fields with dry land.In terms of quality,superior farmland did not achieve compensation balance across all three quality dimensions.③ Compared to the centroid of occupied farmland,the centroid of compensated farmland shifted towards the northwest,characterized by steeper slopes and higher elevations,indicating a risk of marginal land use.④ The 'quantity-quality' integrated perspective revealed an underestima-tion of the impact of land compensation on grain production capacity when viewed solely from the 'quantity' perspective.The grain pro-duction capacity loss in the former was 660.62 tons more than in the latter,reaching 4302.27 tons.Thus,this study suggests enhancing the management of non-grain use of farmland,ensuring sufficient quantity and guaranteed quality of reserve farmland,and implement-ing a mechanism that enforces balance between occupied and compensated farmland.These measures aim to promote the implementa-tion of balanced 'quantity-quality' compensation for farmland in the context of 'comprehensive compensation for occupation.'

'compensation for comprehensive occupation'occupation-compensation balance of farmlandquantityqualitygrain production capacity

宋敏、彭竞毅、易路平、傅健惠

展开 >

中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉 430073

华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北武汉 430070

"大占补" 耕地占补平衡 数量 质量 粮食产能

2024

中国人口·资源与环境
中国可持续发展研究会 山东省可持续发展中心 中国21世纪议程管理中心 山东师范大学

中国人口·资源与环境

CSTPCDCSSCI北大核心
影响因子:3.126
ISSN:1002-2104
年,卷(期):2024.34(10)