实践类型学中的"首要性"定位问题探究——兼论实践与劳动的理论关系
On the Position of the Primacy from the Practice-typology Perspective and on the Theoretical Relationship between Practice and Labor
张兵1
作者信息
摘要
以实践类型学的分析框架观之,马克思所确立的实践"首要性"在其自身之中已本质性地蕴含了"何种形式的实践是首要的"这一问题,并在后来演进为"劳动首要性"与其他"非-劳动"实践形式首要性之间的理论争论.通过对两者论证策略的对勘,可以看出,中国马克思主义者坚持劳动首要性的论证既不是康德—阿伦特式的等级序阶化策略,也不是黑格尔—哈贝马斯式的等级进化策略,而是采用了特定社会劳动的历史生成这一阐释路径,因而显示出更强的理论合理性.
Abstract
From the practice-typology perspective,the primacy of practice established by Marx in-herently contains the question of"what form of practice is primary"and later evolves into the theo-retical competition between the primacy of labor and the primacy of other non-labor's practical forms.In comparing the argumentation strategies of the two,this article finds that the statements on the primacy of labor made by Chinese Marxists neither embraces the Kant-Arendt strategy of hi-erarchical order,nor does it accept the Hegel-Habermas strategy of hierarchical evolution,instead,it adopts the interpretive path of historical generation of certain social labor and shows stronger the-oretical rationality.
关键词
实践类型学/实践首要性/劳动首要性/理论关系Key words
Practice-typology/The primacy of practice/The primacy of labor/Theoretical relation-ship引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD016)
陕西省社会科学基金(2020A024)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据