首页|再论重商主义和重农学派的财富观及其主体之思——从《巴黎手稿》笔记本Ⅲ"私有财产和劳动"谈起

再论重商主义和重农学派的财富观及其主体之思——从《巴黎手稿》笔记本Ⅲ"私有财产和劳动"谈起

扫码查看
通过对重商主义和重农学派的返本研究和历史考察,可以指认如下观点是做了简单化和标签化处理的,即重商主义把劳动或主体置于财富之外,而重农学派则把劳动移入了财富之中,并将其作为财富的主体本质。究其实质,重商主义并没有把财富即货币的观点作为自身的全部理论基点。相反,基于经济政策实践的考量,它把制造业和工业也看作是创造财富的活动,所以重商主义的财富观中蕴含着主体要素;重农学派虽然把劳动移入了财富的视野,但是因为它把土地置于财富创造的首要地位,实际地将农业劳动束缚于其中,从而很难把财富的本质完全归结于劳动,所以劳动在根本意义上只是财富的主体构成,而非其主体本质。此种澄清有助于我们进一步更新传统政治经济学史对它们的基本判断,更合理地把握马克思早期和晚期对它们的完整理解,也有助于我们理解那些时代中主体存在方式的多样化特征及其未来发展趋势。
On Mercantilism and Physiocratic View of Wealth and Its Subjectivism:Starting from"Private Property and Labor"in Paris Manuscript Ⅲ
In studying Mercantilism and Physiocracy retrospectively,scholars figure out that the point of mercantilism putting labor outside of wealth while physiocracy putting labor into wealth re-sulting from an oversimplification of the two.Mercantilism does not consider the equivalence of wealth and money as its whole theoretical basis.On the contrary,based on the application of eco-nomic policies,manufacturing and industry are regarded as wealth-creating activities,and the Mer-cantilist view of wealth contains subjective elements.Although Physiocracy puts labor into the vi-sion of wealth,for it places land in the first place of wealth and thus combines agricultural labor with wealth,it was difficult to attribute the essence of wealth to labor and labor is merely the sub-ject composition of wealth and dos not constitutes its subject essence.A clarification as such helps us to further update the basic judgment of traditional history of political economy and to completely understand them in the early and late phases of Marx,and also helps us to understand the diversi-fied characteristics of the subject in those times and its future development.

MercantilismPhysiocracyWealth viewLaborSubject

黄志军

展开 >

中国人民大学哲学院

重商主义 重农学派 财富观 劳动 主体

2025

中国人民大学学报
中国人民大学

中国人民大学学报

北大核心
影响因子:1.887
ISSN:1000-5420
年,卷(期):2025.39(1)