首页|摩尔根多重意义下的"文明"及其与"国家"的关系

摩尔根多重意义下的"文明"及其与"国家"的关系

扫码查看
在"文明"及其与"国家"的关系问题上长期未能取得共识,根本原因在于,学术界一直简单化地理解和沿用了摩尔根的相关界说.实际上,摩尔根的"文明"至少拥有三重含义:某种特殊的狭义文化,某种特殊的经济、社会和政治等方面意义上的发展状态,以及包括前两者在内的概括言之的人类社会某个特殊的发展阶段.以"国家"的出现为坐标,摩尔根"文明"的产生又至少拥有三种不同的时间:狭义文化意义上的"文明"在前,"国家"在后,两者相差数百年;经济、社会和政治等方面意义上的"文明"早于"国家"数百年而出现;后一种"文明"与"国家"几乎同时产生,或者稍晚出现.摩尔根关于"文明"及其与"国家"关系复杂的多重界说,在逻辑上存在严重缺陷.自摩尔根以来流行的用以判别"文明"的狭义文化标志或标准,验之以历史学、考古学和人类学的实证材料,也都不具有普遍性.
"Civilization"and Its Relationships with"State"in Terms of Lewis H.Morgan's Multiple Meanings
In academia,the protracted split over the concept of"civilization"and its relationship with"state"is fundamentally due to the simplistic understanding and adoption of Lewis H.Morgan's relevant theories.In fact,"civilization"in Morgan's theories has at least three meanings:(1)a particular culture in a narrow sense;(2)a particular developmental state in economic,social and political terms;(3)a particular developmental stage of human society which contains the first two.Taking the emergence of"state"as a reference coordinate,the origin of"civilization"in Morgan's view corresponds to at least three different periods:"civilization"of the first type appeared hundreds of years earlier than the"state,"as did"civilization"of the second type;and"civilization"of the third type was virtually contemporaneous with"state,"or appeared just a little later.Morgan's multilayered theoretical definitions of"civilization"and its complex relationships with"state"have serious logical flaws.The subsequent examination of empirical materials in the fields of history,archaeology,and anthropology using Morgan's distinguishing markers or criteria for civilization in the narrow sense has never found any universality.

易建平

展开 >

华南师范大学历史文化学院(广州510631)

摩尔根 文明 国家 逻辑检验 实证检验

2023

中国社会科学
中国社会科学院

中国社会科学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:5.644
ISSN:1002-4921
年,卷(期):2023.(6)
  • 13