首页|数字人文的理论沿革和范式转向:从"人文研究的数字方法"到"后数字时代的人文研究"

数字人文的理论沿革和范式转向:从"人文研究的数字方法"到"后数字时代的人文研究"

扫码查看
对数字人文和包括语言学、文学、历史学、艺术学等在内的传统人文学科来说,元宇宙和新一代AI技术正在成为库恩所谓"范式革命"的潜在驱动力.本文通过对国内外数字人文发展脉络的梳理,基于范式转向的视角分别提出国内外数字人文发展的分期,并从人文研究的数字方法、方法论的形成和嬗变两个层面分析了国外数字人文发展的理论沿革及从人文计算向数字人文的话语转变和范式转向的生发机理,以考察中国数字人文从传统人文到人文计算、从人文计算到数字人文、从数据驱动到AI驱动的范式转向情况,试图回答以元宇宙和生成式人工智能(GenAI)技术的广泛应用为标识的后数字时代需要怎样的人文研究,并初步规划出后数字时代数字人文的领域蓝图和研究框架.研究得出如下结论:一是国外数字人文范式转向的本质和共性表现在人文研究的数字方法从以数据建模为主转向以界面批判为主,方法论从以计算思维为主转向计算思维和批判思维同时运用且以批判思维为主;二是中国数字人文并未完全完成人文计算向数字人文的转向,大量实践工作仍然围绕数据建模,方法论仍以计算思维为主、批判思维运用不够;三是GenAI可能引发的科学研究范式革命有望解决以数据驱动的第四范式为主导的数字人文领域现存的困境,但还需满足一定的条件;四是后数字时代的数字人文研究应重视批判思维的运用,将技术产生的新的人文问题纳入研究范畴,重新认识人文与技术的关系,将技术不仅作为方法还要作为研究对象.图 1.表 3.参考文献 48.
Theoretical Evolution and Paradigm Shift of Digital Humanities:From"Digital Approaches for Humanities Research"to"Humanities Research in the Post-digital Era"
For digital humanities and the traditional humanities disciplines,including linguistics,literature,history,and the arts,metaverse and the new generation AI technologies are emerging as potential drivers of what Kuhn calls a"paradigm revolution".By sorting out the development context of digital humanities in China and abroad from the perspective of paradigm shift,the author puts forward the stages of the development of digital humanities in China and abroad respectively,and analyzes the theoretical evolution of the development of digital humanities abroad and the generative mechanism of the transformation of discourse and paradigm from humanities computing to digital humanities from two aspects:the formation and evolution of digital methods and methodologies of humanities research.By examining the paradigm shift of China's digital humanities from traditional humanities to humanities computing,from humanities computing to digital humanities,and from data-driven to AI-driven,this paper tries to answer the question of what kind of humanistic research is needed in the post-digital era marked by the widespread application of metaverse and new generation of AI technology.The blueprints and research framework of digital humanities in the post-digital era are preliminarily planned.The following conclusions are drawn:First,the essence and commonness of the paradigm shift of digital humanities abroad are reflected in the shift of digital methods from data modeling to interface criticism,and the shift of methodology from computing thinking to the simultaneous application of computing thinking and critical thinking and mainly critical thinking;Second,China's digital humanities have not fully completed the shift from humanities computing to digital humanities,and a lot of practical work which is still centered on data modeling,the methodology is still dominated by computing thinking,and critical thinking is not used enough;Third,the revolution of scientific research paradigm that may be triggered by the new generation of AI is expected to solve the existing dilemma in the field of digital humanities dominated by the data-driven fourth paradigm,but certain conditions must be met;Fourth,digital humanities research in the post-digital era should attach importance to the application of critical thinking,incorporate new humanistic problems generated by technology into the scope of digital humanities research,re-understand the relationship between humanities and technology,and take technology not only as a method but also as a research object.1 fig.3 tabs.48 refs.

Humanities researchPost-digital eraDigital humanitiesParadigm shiftData-drivenAI-driven

夏翠娟

展开 >

中国人民大学信息资源管理学院

上海图书馆 上海 200031

人文研究 后数字时代 数字人文 范式转向 数据驱动 AI驱动

2024

中国图书馆学报
国家图书馆,中国图书馆学会

中国图书馆学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:4.605
ISSN:1001-8867
年,卷(期):2024.50(5)
  • 16