首页|老年人自身免疫性肝病自身抗体谱的检测及临床特征

老年人自身免疫性肝病自身抗体谱的检测及临床特征

扫码查看
目的 分析采用自身抗体谱检测法进行老年人自身免疫性肝病(autoimmune liver disease,AILD)检测的价值和临床特征.方法 选取福建医科大学附属第一医院泉港总医院2020年7月—2023年6月90例老年AILD患者,根据病情分为A组、B组、C组,各30例.A组为自身免疫性肝炎(autoimmune hepatitis,AIH),B组为原发性胆汁性肝病(primary biliary liver disease,PBC),C组为原发性硬化胆管病(primary sclerosing cholangitis,PSC).3 组均进行自身抗体谱检测.比较 3 组抗线粒体抗体(anti-mitochondrial antibody,AMA)、抗 核 抗 体(antinuclear antibody,ANA)检测结果和抗可溶性肝抗原/肝胰抗原(soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas,SLA/LP)、抗肝肾微粒体(liver-kidney microsomal,LKM)抗体Ⅰ型、抗平滑肌抗体(anti-smooth muscle antibody,SMA)滴度检测结果以及并发症发生率.结果 B组AMA阳性率(90.00%)高于A组(0)、C组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组ANA阳性率(93.33%)高于B组(66.67%)、C组(63.33%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组与C组ANA阳性率、A组与C组AMA阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).A组(40.00%)SLA/LP阳性率高于B组(0)、C组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组抗LKM抗体Ⅰ型阳性率(26.67%)高于B组(0)、C组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组(40.00%)SMA滴度(≥1∶320)阳性率高于B组(0)、C组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).肝硬化发生率B组(60.00%)>A组(20.00%)>C组(0),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组(3.33%)胆囊结石伴慢性胆囊发生率低于C组(46.67%)、B组(23.33%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组高血压、消化性溃疡、贫血、慢性乙型肝炎、干燥综合征、系统性红斑狼疮、类风湿关节炎发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 自身抗体谱检测法对于老年AILD诊断具有积极意义,不同类型AILD在抗原抗体检测阳性率和并发症方面存在一定差异.
Detection and Clinical Characteristics of Autoantibody Spectrum in Elderly Patients With Autoimmune Liver Disease
Objective To analyze the value and clinical characteristics of the detection of autoimmune liver disease(AILD)by autoantibody spectrum in the elderly.Methods A total of 90 patients with AILD were selected in Quangang General Hospital,the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University from July 2020 to June 2003.According to the condition,they were divided into group A and group B and group C,30 cases each.Group A was autoimmune hepatitis,group B was primary biliary liver disease,group C was primary sclerosing cholangiopathy.All three groups were tested for autoantibody profiles.The results of anti-mitochondrial antibody(AMA),antinuclear antibody(ANA),and soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas(SLA/LP),anti-liver-kidney microsomal(LKM)antibody type Ⅰ,anti-smooth muscle antibody(SMA)titer detection and incidence of comorbidities were compared.Results The positive rate of AMA in group B(90.00%)was higher than that in group A(0)and group C(0),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the positive rate of ANA in group A(93.33%)was higher than that in group B(66.67%)and group C(63.33%),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);there were no significant differences in the positive rate of ANA between group B and group C,and the positive rate of AMA between group A and group C(P>0.05).The positive rate of SLA/LP in group A(40.00%)was higher than that in group B(0)and group C(0),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the positive rate of anti-LKM antibody type Ⅰ in group A(26.67%)was higher than that in group B(0)and group C(0),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the positive rate of SMA titer(≥1:320)in group A(40.00%)was higher than that in group B(0)and group C(0),and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Incidence of liver cirrhosis group B(60.00%)>group A(20.00%)>group C(0),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the incidence of gallstones with chronic gallbladder in group A(3.33%)was lower than that in group C(46.67%)and group B(23.33%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);there were no significant differences in the incidence of hypertension,peptic ulcer,anemia,chronic hepatitis B,Sjogren's syndrome,systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Body antibody profiling is of great significance for the diagnosis of AILD in the elderly.There are some differences in the positive rate of antigen antibody detection and complications of different types of AILD.

autoantibody spectrum detectionautoimmune liver diseaseelderly patientsanti-mitochondrial antibodyantinuclear antibodycomorbidities

洪海龙、占启川

展开 >

福建医科大学附属第一医院泉港总医院感染科,福建泉州 362801

福建医科大学附属第一医院泉港总医院检验科,福建 泉州 362801

自身抗体谱检测 自身免疫性肝病 老年患者 抗线粒体抗体 抗核抗体 并发症

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(1)
  • 19