首页|微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值

微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值。方法 以 2022 年 1 月—2023 年 6 月济南市疾病预防控制中心接收的 86 份微生物待检样本为研究对象。从每份待检样本中各取 10 mL以平板计数法进行微生物检验,另各取 10 mL基于微滤膜分离技术获取菌细胞进行微生物检验。比较 2 种检验方法的微生物检出率、微生物检验出报告时间与活菌回收率,评价检验效果。结果 2 种方法共检出阳性样本 47 份,其中微滤膜分离技术检出 45 份,占比为 95。74%,平板计数法检出阳性样本 47 份,占比为 100%。2 种方法的初检 86 份样本的阳性检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);基于复检结果,微滤膜分离技术初诊漏检 2 例,2 种方法的复检阳性率与漏检率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。微滤膜分离技术的平均培养时间(20。24±3。17)h,短于平板计数法的(32。75±4。36)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。随机抽样回收率实验,微滤膜分离技术的阳性菌回收率分别为 87。69%、87。50%、79。07%、67。86%、83。51%,高于平板计数法的 72。01%、71。38%、64。19%、47。32%、65。64%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 微生物检验中应用微滤膜分离技术的阳性检出率与平板计数法相当,但前者的培养时间更短,微生物检验出报告时间早,阳性菌回收率更高,效果优于平板计数法。
Application Value of Microfiltration Membrane Separation Technology in Microbial Testing
Objective To explore the application value of microfiltration membrane separation technology in microbial testing process.Methods A total of 86 microbial samples received by Ji'nan Center for Disease Control and Prevention from January 2022 to June 2023 were used as the research subjects.From each sample to be tested,10 mL were taken for microbiological examination by plate counting method,and 10 mL were taken for bacterial cells by microfiltration membrane separation technology for microbiological examination.The microbial detection rate,microbial detection reporting time and viable bacterial recovery rate of the two test methods were compared and observed to evaluate the test effect.Results A total of 47 positive samples were detected using both methods,of which 45 were detected using microfiltration membrane separation technology,accounting for 95.74%,and 47 were detected using plate counting method,accounting for 100%.There was no statistically significant difference in the positive detection rate between the two methods in the initial examination of 86 samples(P>0.05).Based on the retest results,the microfiltration membrane separation technology missed 2 cases in the initial examination.There was no statistically significant difference in the retest positive rate and missed rate between the two methods(P>0.05).The average cultivation time of microfiltration membrane separation technology was(20.24±3.17)h,which was shorter than that of plate counting method(32.75±4.36)h,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The random sampling recovery rate experiment showed that the positive bacterial recovery rates of the microfiltration membrane separation technology were 87.69%,87.50%,79.07%,67.86%,and 83.51%,respectively,which were generally higher than those of the plate counting method(72.01%,71.38%,64.19%,47.32%and 65.64%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The positive detection rate of using microfiltration membrane separation technology in microbial testing is equivalent to that of plate counting method,but the former has a shorter cultivation time,an earlier reporting time for microbial testing,a higher recovery rate of positive bacteria,and a better effect than plate counting method.

microbial testingmicrofiltration technologymembrane separationbacterial culturemicrobial detection ratereporting time

李新红、李忠

展开 >

济南市疾病预防控制中心慢防所,山东 济南 250021

济南市疾病预防控制中心检验科,山东 济南 250021

微生物检验 微滤技术 膜分离 细菌培养 微生物检出率 出报告时间

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(2)
  • 15