中国卫生标准管理2024,Vol.15Issue(2) :92-95.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2024.02.021

微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值

Application Value of Microfiltration Membrane Separation Technology in Microbial Testing

李新红 李忠
中国卫生标准管理2024,Vol.15Issue(2) :92-95.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2024.02.021

微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值

Application Value of Microfiltration Membrane Separation Technology in Microbial Testing

李新红 1李忠2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 济南市疾病预防控制中心慢防所,山东 济南 250021
  • 2. 济南市疾病预防控制中心检验科,山东 济南 250021
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨微生物检验过程中微滤膜分离技术的应用价值.方法 以 2022 年 1 月—2023 年 6 月济南市疾病预防控制中心接收的 86 份微生物待检样本为研究对象.从每份待检样本中各取 10 mL以平板计数法进行微生物检验,另各取 10 mL基于微滤膜分离技术获取菌细胞进行微生物检验.比较 2 种检验方法的微生物检出率、微生物检验出报告时间与活菌回收率,评价检验效果.结果 2 种方法共检出阳性样本 47 份,其中微滤膜分离技术检出 45 份,占比为 95.74%,平板计数法检出阳性样本 47 份,占比为 100%.2 种方法的初检 86 份样本的阳性检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);基于复检结果,微滤膜分离技术初诊漏检 2 例,2 种方法的复检阳性率与漏检率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).微滤膜分离技术的平均培养时间(20.24±3.17)h,短于平板计数法的(32.75±4.36)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).随机抽样回收率实验,微滤膜分离技术的阳性菌回收率分别为 87.69%、87.50%、79.07%、67.86%、83.51%,高于平板计数法的 72.01%、71.38%、64.19%、47.32%、65.64%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 微生物检验中应用微滤膜分离技术的阳性检出率与平板计数法相当,但前者的培养时间更短,微生物检验出报告时间早,阳性菌回收率更高,效果优于平板计数法.

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of microfiltration membrane separation technology in microbial testing process.Methods A total of 86 microbial samples received by Ji'nan Center for Disease Control and Prevention from January 2022 to June 2023 were used as the research subjects.From each sample to be tested,10 mL were taken for microbiological examination by plate counting method,and 10 mL were taken for bacterial cells by microfiltration membrane separation technology for microbiological examination.The microbial detection rate,microbial detection reporting time and viable bacterial recovery rate of the two test methods were compared and observed to evaluate the test effect.Results A total of 47 positive samples were detected using both methods,of which 45 were detected using microfiltration membrane separation technology,accounting for 95.74%,and 47 were detected using plate counting method,accounting for 100%.There was no statistically significant difference in the positive detection rate between the two methods in the initial examination of 86 samples(P>0.05).Based on the retest results,the microfiltration membrane separation technology missed 2 cases in the initial examination.There was no statistically significant difference in the retest positive rate and missed rate between the two methods(P>0.05).The average cultivation time of microfiltration membrane separation technology was(20.24±3.17)h,which was shorter than that of plate counting method(32.75±4.36)h,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The random sampling recovery rate experiment showed that the positive bacterial recovery rates of the microfiltration membrane separation technology were 87.69%,87.50%,79.07%,67.86%,and 83.51%,respectively,which were generally higher than those of the plate counting method(72.01%,71.38%,64.19%,47.32%and 65.64%),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The positive detection rate of using microfiltration membrane separation technology in microbial testing is equivalent to that of plate counting method,but the former has a shorter cultivation time,an earlier reporting time for microbial testing,a higher recovery rate of positive bacteria,and a better effect than plate counting method.

关键词

微生物检验/微滤技术/膜分离/细菌培养/微生物检出率/出报告时间

Key words

microbial testing/microfiltration technology/membrane separation/bacterial culture/microbial detection rate/reporting time

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
被引量1
参考文献量14
段落导航相关论文