首页|骨科Ⅰ类切口手术预防应用抗菌药物药学干预的价值研究

骨科Ⅰ类切口手术预防应用抗菌药物药学干预的价值研究

扫码查看
目的 分析在骨科Ⅰ类切口手术患者预防性应用抗菌药物中实施药学干预的作用和价值.方法 选取福建省福鼎市医院骨科 2021 年 1-12 月收治的患者中随机抽取 800 例作为研究对象,根据干预时间分组,1-6 月的 400 例患者归入对照组,7-12 月的 400 例患者归入观察组.对照组给予常规干预,观察组给予药学干预.对 2 组患者的预防性抗菌药物应用率、药物合理应用率、用药疗程与时机、用药类型等指标进行比较.结果 对照组 400 例患者中预防性应用抗菌药物患者 229 例,药物应用率为 57.25%;观察组 400 例患者中预防性应用抗菌药物患者 212 例,药物应用率为 53.00%,组间预防性抗菌药物应用率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组抗菌药物合理应用率指标中疗程合理率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).2 组在用药时机合理和选择合理方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组术后 24 h内的给药率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后≥24~48 h内及术后 48 h后给药率均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);同时 2 组患者术前≥30~60 min给药率、>术前 60 min及<30 min给药率、术后给药率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).2 组患者的预防性抗菌药物应用类型均集中在第一代头孢类药物中,以头孢唑林为主,2 组患者的第一代、二代头孢类药物及林可酰胺类药物应用率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 在骨科Ⅰ类切口手术患者预防性应用抗菌药物中实施药学干预对提升抗菌药物合理应用率有重要作用,因此值得在临床中进行推广.
Study on the Value of Pharmacologic Intervention With Antibiotics for Surgical Prophylaxis of ClassⅠ Incision in Orthopedics
Objective To analyze the role and value of pharmaceutical intervention in prophylactic use of antibiotics in patients undergoing typeⅠ incision surgery.Methods A total of 800 patients were randomly selected from the department of orthopedics of Fujian Province Fuding Hospital during January to December 2021 as the study object.According to the intervention time,400 patients from January to June were classified into the control group,and 400 patients from July to December were classified into the observation group.The control group was given routine intervention,and the observation group was given pharmaceutical intervention.Indicators such as prophylactic antibiotic application rate,rational drug application rate,drug duration and timing,and drug type of patients in different groups were compared.Results Among the 400 patients in the control group,229 cases were prophylactic antibiotics,the drug application rate was 57.25%.Among the 400 patients in the observation group,212 patients were treated with prophylactic antibiotics,the drug application rate was 53.00%,and there was no significant difference in the rate of prophylactic antibiotics application among groups(P>0.05).The rational rate of treatment course of antibiotics in observation group was higher than that in control group,the difference was tatistically significant(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups in rational timing and rational choice of medication(P>0.05).The drug administration rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group within 24 h after surgery,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),and the drug administration rate in the observation group≥24 to 48 h after surgery and 48 h after surgery was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).At the same time,there was no statistical significance in the preoperative≥30 to 60 min administration rate,the preoperative>60 min administration rate and the postoperative<30 min administration rate between the two group,the difference was tatistically significant(P>0.05).The application types of prophylactic antibiotics in the two groups were concentrated in the first-generation cephalosporins,mainly cefazolin.There was no statistical significance in the application rates of the first-generation and second-generation cephalosporins and lincoamides between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Pharmaceutical intervention in prophylactic use of antibiotics in orthopaedic patients undergoing typeⅠ incision surgery plays an important role in improving the rational application rate of antibiotics,so it is worth promoting in clinical practice.

orthopedic patientstypeⅠ incision surgeryprophylactic drugsantimicrobial drugspharmaceutical interventionrationality of medication

叶小舟、翁淑峰

展开 >

福建省福鼎市医院药剂科临床药学室,福建 福鼎 355200

骨科患者 Ⅰ类切口手术 预防用药 抗菌药物 药学干预 用药合理性

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(3)
  • 12