首页|医学会与司法鉴定机构医疗损害鉴定模式的比较

医学会与司法鉴定机构医疗损害鉴定模式的比较

扫码查看
目前医学会和司法鉴定机构均可进行医疗损害鉴定,呈现为鉴定"二元化"现象。文章从鉴定文书格式、鉴定专家选择、鉴定模式、鉴定意见 4 个方面分析了 2 类医疗损害鉴定机构存在的差异,主要表现在医学会鉴定文书格式较规范、随机抽取专家更能体现选择的公正性、专家组合议制更科学、分析意见更专业,司法鉴定机构指定专家的方式更具灵活性、分析意见语言逻辑组织更胜一筹。建议制定规范、统一的医疗损害鉴定组织形式,采取"X名临床专家+1 名法医"的专家组构成模式,完善鉴定相关制度,以期实现医疗损害鉴定的科学化、规范化。
Comparison of Medical Damage Appraisal Models Between Medical Associations and Judicial Appraisal Institutions
At present,both medical associations and forensic appraisal institutions can conduct medical damage appraisal,presenting a phenomenon of"duality"in appraisal.This article mainly analyzes the differences between two types of medical damage appraisal institutions from four aspects,appraisal document format,appraisal expert selection,appraisal mode,and appraisal opinions.The medical association has a more normative format of appraisal document,adopts random drawing that can reflect the impartiality in expert selection in a better way,utilizes a more scientific principle of panel hearing,and provides more professional analytical opinions.However,the forensic appraisal institution adopts a more flexible way for expert designation and has better logic and organization of analytical opinions.It is recommended to develop a normative and unified organizational form for medical damage appraisal,adopt the appraisal model of"X clinical experts and 1 forensic expert",and improve the appraisal related system,in order to achieve scientific and standardized appraisal.

medical disputesmedical damagemedical association appraisalforensic appraisalappraisal modelidentification procedure

刘小琴

展开 >

盐城市卫生健康促进中心人才服务科,江苏盐城 224002

盐城市医学会医鉴办,江苏 盐城 224002

医疗纠纷 医疗损害 医学会鉴定 司法鉴定 鉴定模式 鉴定程序

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(4)
  • 21