首页|放疗计划参数对剂量验证计划γ通过率的相关性研究

放疗计划参数对剂量验证计划γ通过率的相关性研究

扫码查看
目的 探讨头颈部放疗计划参数对剂量验证计划γ通过率的相关性。方法 选取 2019 年 11 月—2021 年 9 月福建肿瘤医院放疗中心收治的 184 例放射治疗的头颈部肿瘤患者。其中85 例采用调强放疗(intensity-modulated radio therapy,IMRT)计划,99 例采用容积旋转调强放疗(volumetric modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划,通过电子射野影像装置,使用ArcCHECK分别对IMRT和VMAT计划进行计量验证,并在不同的γ分析标准(选取 1%/1 mm,2%/2 mm和 3%/3 mm)下验证剂量通过率。分析不同放疗计划中射野复杂度指标,并判断其射野复杂度指标与γ通过率的相关性。结果 VMAT计划在1%/1 mm标准下γ通过率低于IMRT计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);VMAT计划和IMRT计划在 2%/2 mm标准下γ通过率分别为(90。72±2。84)%、(90。59±5。19)%,在 3%/3 mm标准下γ通过率分别为(97。02±1。71)%、(98。64±1。00)%,2 种计划在 3%/3 mm标准下的平均γ通过率均较高,在2%/2 mm标准下的平均γ通过率均有所下降,2 种计划比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。在不同射野复杂度指标中,VMAT计划的计划标准跳数(plan normalized MU,PMU)、计划平均射野不规则性(plan averaged beam irregularity,PI)、计划平均射野调制(plan averaged beam modulation,PM)均大于IMRT计划,VMAT计划的平均调制复杂度分数(modulation complexity score,MCS)、计划平均射野面积(plan averaged beam area,PA)小于IMRT计划,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。Spearman相关性检验结果表明,IMRT计划中,在 2%/2 mm标准下,MCS、PM和γ通过率呈弱相关性(|r|<0。4,P<0。05),PMU和γ通过率呈中度相关性(0。4≤|r|≤0。7,P<0。05),在 3%/3 mm标准下,PMU、MCS、PM和γ通过率呈中度相关性(0。4≤|r|≤0。7,P<0。05);PA、PI与γ通过率均无相关性(P>0。05);VMAT计划中,在 2%/2 mm标准下,PMU、MCS、PI、PM和γ通过率呈中度相关性(0。4≤|r|≤0。7,P<0。05),在 3%/3 mm标准下,PMU、MCS、PM、PI和γ通过率呈中度相关性(0。4≤|r|≤≤0。7,P<0。05),PA与γ通过率均无相关性(P>0。05)。结论 射野复杂度指标与γ通过率具有不同程度的相关性,可在剂量验证前调整射野指标辅助设计放疗计划。
Correlation Study of Radiotherapy Plan Parameters on Dose-Validated Plan Gamma Passing Rate
Objective To investigate the correlation between the parameters of head and neck radiotherapy plan and the gamma passing rate of dose-validated plan.Methods A total of 184 head and neck tumor patients treated with radiotherapy in the radiotherapy center,Fujian Cancer Hospital from November 2019 to September 2021 were selected,of which 85 patients were treated with intensity-modulated radio therapy(IMRT)plan and 99 patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)plan.The IMRT and VMAT plans were respectively verified by electronic beam imaging device and ArcCHECK,and different gamma analysis criteria(at 1%/1 mm,2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm)were verified.The field complexity index of different radiotherapy plans was analyzed,and the correlation between the field complexity index and gamma passing rate was evaluated.Results The gamma passing rate in VMAT plan was lower than that in IMRT plan under the standard of 1%/1 mm,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The gamma passing rate of VMAT plan and IMRT plan was(90.72±2.84)%and(90.59±5.19)%respectively under 2%/2 mm standard,and the gamma passing rate under 3%/3 mm standard was(97.02±1.71)%and(98.64±1.00)%respectively.The average gamma passing rate of IMRT plan and VMAT plan under 3%/3 mm standard were higher,while the average gamma passing rate under 2%/2 mm standard was decreased,there was no significant difference between the two plans(P>0.05).Among different field complexity indexes,plan normalized MU(PMU),plan averaged beam irregularity(PI),and plan averaged beam modulation(PM)of VMAT plan were higher than those of IMRT plan,while modulation complexity score(MCS)and plan averaged beam area(PA)of VMAT plan were lower than those of IMRT plan,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Spearman correlation test results showed that under 2%/2 mm standard in IMRT plan,the MCS,PM and gamma passing rate showed weak correlation(|r|<0.4,P<0.05),respectively,while the PMU and gamma passing rate showed a moderate correlation(0.4≤|r|≤0.7,P<0.05).At 3%/3 mm,the PMU,MCS,PM and gamma passing rate showed a moderate correlation(0.4≤|r|≤0.7,P<0.05),respectively.There was no correlation between PA,PI and gamma passing rate(P>0.05).In the VMAT plan,the PMU,MCS,PI,PM and gamma passing rate showed a moderate correlation under 2%/2 mm standard(0.4≤|r|≤0.7,P<0.05),respectively,under 3%/3 mm standard,the of PMU,MCS,PM,PI and gamma passing rate showed a moderate correlation(0.4≤|r|≤0.7,P<0.05),respectively,there was no correlation between PA,PI and gamma passing rate(P>0.05).Conclusion The field complexity index is correlated with the gamma passing rate to varying degrees,and the field complexity index can be adjusted to assist in the design of radiotherapy plan before dose validation.

head and neck tumorsintensity-modulated radio therapyvolumetric modulated arc therapdose validationfield complexity indexgamma passing rate

游鸿强

展开 >

福建医科大学肿瘤临床医学院 / 福建省肿瘤医院放疗中心,福建 福州 350014

头颈部肿瘤 调强放疗 容积旋转调强放疗 剂量验证 射野指标 γ通过率

福建省科技创新联合资金项目

2021Y9210

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(4)
  • 17