首页|依托咪酯复合不同剂量丙泊酚对MECT治疗重度抑郁症的影响

依托咪酯复合不同剂量丙泊酚对MECT治疗重度抑郁症的影响

扫码查看
目的 分析依托咪酯复合不同剂量丙泊酚对无抽搐电休克疗法(modified electro-convulsive therapy,MECT)治疗重度抑郁症患者的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析2022年1月—2023年3月在福州市第二总医院神经精神病防治院接受MECT治疗的111例重度抑郁症患者,依照丙泊酚剂量分为A组、B组与C组,各37例。A组静脉推注0。1 mg/kg依托咪酯+1。0 mg/kg丙泊酚,B组静脉推注0。1 mg/kg依托咪酯+1。5 mg/kg丙泊酚,C组静脉推注0。1 mg/kg依托咪酯+2。0 mg/kg丙泊酚。比较3组麻醉效果及安全性。结果 T0及T3时,3组心率(heart rate,HR)、收缩压(systolic blood pressure,SBP)、舒张压(diastolic blood pressure,DBP)及血氧饱和度(oxygen saturation of blood,SpO2)水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05);T1及T2时,3组HR、SBP、DBP水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。A组躁动总发生率为25。50%,B组躁动总发生率为16。50%,C组躁动总发生率为13。50%,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);B组及C组躁动总发生率低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。A组躁动持续时间为(6。14±1。19)min、B组为(4。25±1。27)min、C组为(4。20±1。24)min,3组躁动持续时间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);B组及C组躁动持续时间短于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。A组与B组脑电癫痫波发作时间均长于C组,呼吸抑制低于C组,意识恢复时间短于C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);A组与B组脑电癫痫波发作时间、呼吸抑制、意识恢复时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。3组不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 接受MECT的重度抑郁症患者应用0。1 mg/kg依托咪酯复合1。5 mg/kg丙泊酚生命体征更加稳定,而且能够保证治疗的安全性,可促进患者术后恢复。
Effects of Etomidate Combined With Different Doses of Propofol on the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With MECT
Objective To analyze the effects of etomidate combined with different doses of propofol on patients with major depressive disorder treated with modified electro-convulsive therapy (MECT). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for 111 patients with major depressive disorder who received MECT treatment at Fuzhou Second General Hospital Neuropsychiatric Prevention and Treatment Institute from January 2022 to March 2023. They were divided into group A,group B and group C according to the dosage of propofol,37 cases in each group. Group A received intravenous injection of 0.1 mg/kg etomidate+1.0 mg/kg propofol,group B received intravenous injection of 0.1 mg/kg etomidate+1.5 mg/kg propofol,and group C received intravenous injection of 0.1 mg/kg etomidate+2.0 mg/kg propofol. The anesthesia effects and safety of the three groups were compared. Results At T0 and T3,there was no significant difference in heart rate (HR),systolic blood pressure (SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and oxygen saturation of blood (SpO2) levels among three groups (P>0.05). At T1 and T2,the levels of HR,SBP,DBP in three groups were compared,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of agitation was 25.50% in group A,16.50% in group B and 13.50% in group C,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of agitation in groups B and C was lower than that in group A,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The duration of agitation was (6.14±1.19) min in group A,(4.25±1.27) min in group B and (4.20±1.24) min in group C,and the difference between the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The duration of agitation in groups B and C was shorter than that in group A,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The seizure time of EEG epileptic waves of group A and group B was longer than that of group C,respiratory depression was lower than that of group C,and consciousness recovery time was shorter than that of group C,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in seizure time of EEG epileptic waves,respiratory depression and consciousness recovery time between group A and group B (P>0.05) There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The use of 0.1 mg/kg etomidate combined with 1.5 mg/kg propofol in patients with severe depression undergoing MECT is more stable in terms of vital signs,and can ensure the safety of treatment and promote postoperative recovery.

modified electro-convulsive therapyetomidatepropofolmajor depressive disordersital signspostoperative recoveryadverse reactions

李妙绒、陈明、李晓丹、翁赛峥

展开 >

福州市第二总医院神经精神病防治院物理治疗科,福建福州 350008

福州市第二总医院神经精神病防治院精神科,福建福州 350008

无抽搐电休克疗法 依托咪酯 丙泊酚 重度抑郁症 生命体征 术后恢复 不良反应

2024

中国卫生标准管理
《中国卫生标准管理》杂志社

中国卫生标准管理

影响因子:1.374
ISSN:1674-9316
年,卷(期):2024.15(20)