首页|某高强和超高强汽车钢板生产企业职业病危害因素评价

某高强和超高强汽车钢板生产企业职业病危害因素评价

扫码查看
目的 评价某高强和超高强汽车钢板生产企业职业病危害因素及防控措施.方法 依据相关法律法规,采用职业卫生调查、职业病危害因素检测、检查表分析法、职业健康检查法及综合分析等方法对该企业的职业病危害因素进行分析与评价.结果 该企业生产过程中产生的主要职业病危害因素有化学有害物质(一氧化碳、氮氧化物、二氧化硫、盐酸、可溶性镍化合物、氨、氢氧化钠)和物理因素(噪声、工频电场),检测结果均符合国家职业接触限值要求.其中,一氧化碳CTWA<1.16 mg/m3、CSTEL<1.16 mg/m3,盐酸CMAC<0.5 mg/m3,可溶性镍化合物CTWA<0.013 mg/m3,氢氧化钠 CMAC0.19 mg/m3,40 h 等效声级(LEX,40h)为 62.4~83.1 dB(A),8 h 时间加权工频电场0.006 kV/m.结论 该企业生产设备机械化、自动化、密闭化程度相对较高,企业采取的有效防护措施获得了较好的防控效果.
Evaluation of occupational hazards in a high-strength and ultra-high strength automotive steel sheet production enterprise
Objective To evaluate the preventive measures of occupational hazards in a high-strength and ultra-high strength automotive steel sheet production enterprise.Methods According to the related laws and regulations,field hygiene investigation,occupational risk factors monitoring,checklist,occupational health examination and comprehensive analysis were used to evaluate the project.Results In the production process,the major occupational hazards are chemical hazard factors(carbon monoxide,nitrogen oxides,sulfur dioxide,hydrochloric acid,soluble nickel compound,ammonia and sodi-um hydroxide)and physical hazards(noise and power frequency electric field),all detection results conform to the national standards.Among these are carbon monoxide CTWA<1.16 mg/m3,CSTEL<1.16 mg/m3,hydrochloric acid CMAC<0.5 mg/m3,soluble nickel compound CTWA<0.013 mg/m3,sodium hydroxide CMAC 0.19 mg/m3,noise(LEX,40h)62.4-83.1 dB(A)and power frequency electric field 0.006 kV/m.Conclusion The production enterprise has relatively high mechaniza-tion、automation and tightness,and the effective measures and the strengthened individual protection were used to achieve protective effects preferably.

Automotive steel sheetOccupational disease hazardsDetectionEvaluation

金伟

展开 >

鞍山市疾病预防控制中心质量管理科,辽宁 鞍山 114002

汽车钢板 职业病危害 检测 评价

2024

中国卫生工程学
中华预防医学会,吉林省预防医学会

中国卫生工程学

影响因子:0.416
ISSN:1671-4199
年,卷(期):2024.23(2)
  • 9