"两种医联体"帮扶模式对提升社区卫生服务中心能力的比较分析
Comparative Analysis on Capacity Enhancement of Community Health Centers by Close and Loose Medical Association Support Models
李晓轩 1田昕2
作者信息
- 1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院 北京 101100
- 2. 首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院 北京 100102
- 折叠
摘要
目的:比较分析紧密型和松散型医联体帮扶模式对提升社区卫生服务中心能力的作用与效果.方法:以松散型医联体帮扶方式下的社区卫生服务中心和紧密型医联体帮扶方式下的社区卫生服务中心为研究对象,采用双重差分法定量比较分析不同帮扶模式下社区卫生服务中心的能力提升效果.结果:紧密型医联体和松散型医联体帮扶模式均提升了社区卫生服务中心的门急诊人次、中医诊疗人次、转诊人次.紧密型医联体帮扶模式提升了社区卫生服务中心的出院人次.结论:紧密型医联体帮扶模式可以提升社区卫生服务中心能力,且效果优于松散型医联体帮扶模式.
Abstract
Objective:To comparative analyze the role and effectiveness of different healthcare consortium support models in enhancing the capacity of community health centers.Methods:Using community health service centers under the loose medical association support mode and the close medical association support mode as research subjects,the data on medical service capacity were quantitatively analyzed using DID(Difference-in-Difference).Results:Both close medical association and the loose medical association support models have increased the number of outpatient and emergency room visits,Chinese medicine consultations,and referrals to community health centers.The close medical association support model also increased the number of discharges from the community health centers.Conclusion:Close medical consortium can enhance the capacity of community health centers,and the effect is better than loose medical consortium.
关键词
医疗联合体/帮扶模式/社区卫生服务中心/双重差分法Key words
medical association/support models/community health center/Difference-in-Difference引用本文复制引用
基金项目
首都卫生发展科研专项项目(首发2022-4G-20219)
北京友谊医院科研启动基金资助项目(yyqdktg12021-6)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据