首页|基于阴道微生态对比研究宫颈HPV16与HPV52单一亚型感染特征

基于阴道微生态对比研究宫颈HPV16与HPV52单一亚型感染特征

扫码查看
目的 对比分析宫颈人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)16与52单一亚型感染阴道微生态特征,探讨HPV16与52单一亚型阳性患者阴道微生态差异的临床意义,探求治疗不同亚型HPV感染的方法。方法 将2020年2月至2023年1月在遂宁市第一人民医院妇产科门诊常规宫颈癌筛查的女性(20~65岁)作为研究对象,纳入符合标准的HPV16型、HPV52型、HPV阴性研究对象各165例作为参试者,HPV16、52型均为单一亚型感染,HPV阴性组作为对照组,3组参试者一般资料对比差异无统计学意义(P<0。05)。3组研究对象均行HPV分型、液基薄层细胞学(TCT)、阴道微生态检测,对比分析3组参试者阴道微生态相关指标(pH、过氧化氢、唾液酸苷酶、白细胞酯酶、葡萄糖醛酸酶、乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶、白细胞、杆菌、球菌、线索细胞、滴虫、清洁度)以及TCT情况。结果 (1)3组参试者的阴道内pH情况,HPV16型组(5。01±0。31)显著高于HPV52 型组(4。71±0。42)(F=56。26,P<0。05),也较对照组(4。68±0。43)明显异常(F=47。10,P<0。05);而HPV52型组阴道内pH与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(F=0。12,P>0。05)。(2)HPV 16型组参试者阴道内白细胞酯酶、阴道微生态、TCT、pH>4。5异常人数较HPV52型组、对照组显著增多,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05),但是HPV52型组参试者阴道内白细胞酯酶、pH>4。5异常人数较对照组无明显增加,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05);而HPV16型组参试者阴道内过氧化氢、葡萄糖醛酸酶、乙酰氨基葡萄糖苷酶、清洁度、白细胞、杆菌较HPV52型组差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05),但是2组均较对照组明显异常,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05);3组参试者阴道内唾液酸苷酶、球菌、线索细胞、滴虫比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0。05)。结论 无论是HPV16型还是52型患者均存在阴道微生态失衡,HPV16型患者较52型更易出现微生态失调和子宫颈上皮内病变,可能与其阴道内较高pH有关,调节pH可能是治疗高危型HPV16型的一个方向,但可能并不适用于HPV52型,治疗HPV52型患者需要寻找新的思路。
Characteristics of cervical HPV16 and HPV52 single subtype infections based on comparison of vaginal microbiome
Objective To compare and analyze the characteristics of vaginal microecology of cervical human papillo-mavirus(HPV)16 and 52 single subtype infections,and explore the clinical significance of vaginal microbiome differ-ences between HPV16 and 52 single subtype positive patients.Methods A total of 165 cases each of HPV16,HPV52 and HPV-negative subjects were included;all the HPV16 and HPV52 cases were single subtype infections,and the HPV-negat-ive group was used as a blank control group.There was no statistical difference in the general data among the three groups(P<0.05).HPV typing,liquid-based thin-layer cytology(TCT),and vaginal microecology were detected in all three groups,and the relevant indexes of vaginal microecology(pH,hydrogen peroxide,sialidase,leukocyte esterase enzyme,glucuronidase,acetylglucosaminidase,leukocyte,bacilli,coccus,clue cells,trichomoniasis,cleanliness)and TCT were compared and analyzed.Results(1)The intravaginal pH value was significantly higher in the HPV16 group(5.01±0.31)than in the HPV52(4.71±0.42)group(F=56.26,P<0.05),and significantly abnormal(F=47.10,P<0.05)compared to that in the blank control group(4.68±0.43),while there was no significant difference in intravaginal pH value between HPV52 group and the control group(F=0.12,P>0.05).(2)Compared with HPV52 group and blank control group,the number of abnormal vaginal leukocyte esterase,vaginal microecology,TCT,pH>4.5 abnormalities in HPV16 group and blank con-trol group significantly increased(all P<0.05),but the number of vaginal leukocyte esterase and pH>4.5 in HPV52 group did not increased significantly compared with the blank control group(all P>0.05).Compared with the HPV52 group,there were no significant differences in vaginal hydrogen peroxide,glucuronidase,acetylglucosaminidase,cleanliness,leukocytes and bar bacteria in HPV16 group(all P>0.05),but both groups were significantly abnormal compared with the blank control group(all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in vaginal sialidase,coccus,lead cells and trich-omoniasis among the three groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Both HPV16 and HPV52 patients have vaginal microecolo-gical imbalance.HPV16 patients are more likely to have microbiosis and cervical intraepithelial lesions than patients with HPV52 infection,which may be related to the higher vaginal pH.Adjusting pH may be a direction for the treatment of high-risk HPV16 patients,but it may not be applicable for HPV52,and new ideas need to be found for the treatment of HPV52.

Vaginal microbiomeHPV16 typeHPV52 typeInfection characteristics

谢秀超、彭卫东、候琳、黄林、张娅、张光兰、朱小琴、吴奕静、聂红、刘鱼

展开 >

遂宁市第一人民医院,四川遂宁 629000

成都中医药大学附属医院

中国医学科学院输血研究所

阴道微生态 HPV16型 HPV52型 感染特征

四川省中医药局项目四川省医学会项目

2021MS479Q23060

2024

中国微生态学杂志
中华预防医学会 大连医科大学

中国微生态学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.115
ISSN:1005-376X
年,卷(期):2024.36(3)
  • 22