首页|低压氧舱处置时间对高海拔大鼠心搏骤停模型制备的影响

低压氧舱处置时间对高海拔大鼠心搏骤停模型制备的影响

扫码查看
目的 建立高海拔低压低氧环境大鼠心搏骤停模型,探讨低压氧舱处置时间对建立高海拔大鼠心搏骤停模型的影响.方法 以SPF级健康雄性SD大鼠作为研究对象,实验分别在 2 个不同海拔地区开展.将中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所高原分所(青海西宁)的实验大鼠称重、编号,放入低压氧舱中饲养(模拟海拔高度 3000 m,升降速 15 m/min,温度 20℃,舱内压力 69.5 kPa,舱内氧气压力 14.5 kPa),饲养 30d后按照随机数字表法选取 30 只大鼠,采用窒息法制备心搏骤停模型,作为低压低氧 30d组;饲养 60d后再次随机选取 40 只大鼠制备心搏骤停模型,作为低压低氧 60d组.中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所(广东广州)采用相同方法随机选取 30 只大鼠制备心搏骤停模型,作为平原对照组.比较各组大鼠制模前体质量及制模过程中窒息诱导时间的差异.结果 最终低压低氧 30d组有 16 只大鼠完成心搏骤停模型制备,低压低氧 60d组有 22 只大鼠完成心搏骤停模型制备.平原对照组、低压低氧 30d组与低压低氧 60d组大鼠制模前体质量差异无统计学意义[g:429.00(389.25,440.75)、440.00(415.50,486.25)、440.00(400.00,452.50),均P>0.05].低压低氧 60d组大鼠窒息诱导时间较低压低氧 30d组明显延长(s:294.59±75.39 比 234.31±93.86,P<0.01),甚至约为平原对照组的 1.4 倍(s:294.59±75.39 比 208.73±30.88,P<0.01);而低压低氧 30d组大鼠窒息诱导时间与平原对照组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 低压氧舱处置 60d的大鼠更适用于制备高海拔心搏骤停模型,也符合高海拔大鼠氧储备和耐缺氧的机体特点.
Discussion on the relationship between the disposal time of hypobaric oxygen chamber and the establishment of rat cardiac arrest model at high altitude
Objective To establish the rat cardiac arrest model in high-altitude hypobaric hypoxia environment,and to explore the effect of the treatment time in the hypobaric oxygen chamber on the reproduction of high-altitude rat cardiac arrest model.Methods SPF grade healthy male Sprague-Dawley(SD)rats were used as observation subjects.The experiment was conducted in two different altitude areas.The rats from the Plateau Branch of Institute of Cardiopulmonary and Cerebral Resuscitation of Sun Yat-sen University(Xining,Qinghai)were weighed and numbered,and they were placed in a hypobaric oxygen chamber(simulated altitude of 3 000 meters,speed of ascent and descent of 15 m/min,temperature of 20℃,cabin pressure of 69.5 kPa,cabin oxygen pressure of 14.5 kPa).After 30 days of feeding,the rats were obtained according to random number table method,and the cardiac arrest model was established by asphyxia method as the 30-day hypobaric hypoxia group.After 60 days of feeding,rats were randomly selected again,and the cardiac arrest model was established as the 60-day hypobaric hypoxia group.Thirty rats were randomly selected from the Institute of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral Resuscitation at Sun Yat-sen University(Guangzhou,Guangdong)by the same method,and the cardiac arrest model was established as the plain control group.The differences in the body weight of rat modeling precursors and the induction time of asphyxia during the modeling process among different groups were compared.Results Finally,cardiac arrest model was established in 16 rats in the 30-day hypobaric hypoxia group and in 22 rats in the 60-day hypobaric hypoxia group.There was no significant difference in the body weight of rats before modeling among the plain control group,30-day hypobaric hypoxia group and 60-day hypobaric hypoxia group[g:429.00(389.25,440.75),440.00(415.50,486.25),440.00(400.00,452.50),all P>0.05].The asphyxia induction time of rats in the 60-day hypobaric hypoxia group was significantly longer than that in the 30-day hypobaric hypoxia group(s:294.59±75.39 vs.234.31±93.86,P<0.01),even about 1.4 times of the plain control group(s:294.59±75.39 vs.208.73±30.88,P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the asphyxia induction time between the 30-day hypobaric hypoxia group and the plain control group(P>0.05).Conclusion Rats treated in a hypobaric oxygen chamber for 60 days are more suitable for the preparation of high-altitude cardiac arrest model,and are also consistent with the oxygen reserve and hypoxia tolerance of high-altitude rats.

High altitude areaCardiac arrestRat modelHypobaric oxygen chamber

刘洁、马增文、石晓旭、吴妍、南措吉、宋凤卿、张斌

展开 >

青海大学附属人民医院(青海省人民医院)急诊科,中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所高原分所,西宁 810000

中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院急诊科,中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所,广东广州 510006

高海拔地区 心搏骤停 大鼠模型 低压氧舱

青海省科技计划项目

2020-ZJ-771

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(1)
  • 12