首页|应用超声动态监测胃残余量指导重症机械通气患者早期营养治疗逐步达标

应用超声动态监测胃残余量指导重症机械通气患者早期营养治疗逐步达标

扫码查看
目的 探讨床旁超声动态监测胃残余量(GRV)在重症机械通气患者早期肠内营养达到不同目标能量的应用价值.方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,纳入 2022 年 7 月至 12 月入住宁夏医科大学总医院重症医学科 42 例机械通气患者.按随机数字表法将患者分为传统回抽胃液法评估GRV指导肠内营养组(对照组,22 例)和床旁超声评估GRV指导肠内营养组(试验组,20 例).收集两组患者一般资料,动态观察超敏C-反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、中性粒细胞百分比(Neut%)、降钙素原(PCT)、淋巴细胞绝对值(LYM)、前白蛋白(PA)、视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)等临床指标.比较两组炎症、感染、免疫、营养指标以及返流/误吸、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率,并进一步比较两组患者启动肠内营养第 1、3、5 天分别达到目标能量25%、50%及 70%的喂养比例.结果 ① 两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、机械通气时间、以及入院时急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、重症营养风险评分(NUTRIC)差异均无统计学意义,具有可比性.②启动肠内营养第 1 天,两组间感染、炎症、免疫和营养指标比较差异无统计学意义;启动肠内营养第 3 天,试验组hs-CRP低于对照组,LYM、PA高于对照组[hs-CRP(mg/L):129.60±75.18 比 185.20±63.74,LYM:1.00±0.84 比 0.60±0.41,PA(mg/L):27.30±3.66 比 22.30±2.55,均P<0.05];启动肠内营养第 5 天,试验组hs-CRP、Neut%、PCT低于对照组,LYM、PA高于对照组[hs-CRP(mg/L):101.70±54.32 比 148.40±36.35,Neut%:(85.50±7.66)%比(92.90±6.01)%,PCT(μg/L):0.7(0.3,2.7)比 3.6(1.2,7.5),LYM:1.00±0.68 比 0.50±0.38,PA(mg/L):27.10±4.57 比 20.80±3.51,均P<0.05].两组间各时间点IL-6、RBP比较差异均无统计学意义.③启动肠内营养第 3 天、第 5 天试验组分别达到 50%、70%目标能量的比例明显高于对照组(70.0%比 36.4%,70.0%比 36.4%,均P<0.05).④启动肠内营养第 5 天,试验组返流/误吸和VAP的发生率均明显低于对照组(返流/误吸发生率:5.0%比28.6%,VAP发生率:10.0%比36.4%,均P<0.05).结论 床旁超声动态监测GRV可精准提高重症机械通气患者启动肠内营养第 3 天达到目标能量 50%、第 5 天达到目标能量 75%的比例,改善患者炎症、免疫和营养状况,并且可预防返流/误吸及VAP的发生.
The dynamic monitoring of gastric residual volume by ultrasound was used to guide the early nutritional treatment of patients with severe mechanical ventilation to gradually achieve the standard
Objective To explore the application value of dynamic monitoring of gastric residual volume(GRV)in achieving different target energy in severe mechanical ventilation patients.Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted.Forty-two patients with mechanical ventilation admitted to the department of critical care medicine of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from July to December 2022 were enrolled.According to the random number table method,patients were divided into GRV guided enteral nutrition by traditional gastric juice pumpback method(control group,22 patients)and GRV guided enteral nutrition by bedside ultrasound(test group,20 patients).General data were collected from both groups,and clinical indicators such as hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6),neutrophil percentage(Neut%),procalcitonin(PCT),absolute lymphocytes(LYM),prealbumin(PA),and retinol-binding protein(RBP)were dynamically observed.Inflammation,infection,immunity,nutritional indicators,and the incidence of reflux/aspiration,ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP)were compared between the two groups,and further compared the proportion of patients with respectively to reach the target energy 25%,50%,and 70%on days 1,3,and 5 of initiated enteral nutrition.Results ① There were no significant differences in gender,age,body mass index(BMI),duration of mechanical ventilation,and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ),sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),severe nutritional risk score(NUTRIC)at admission between the two groups,indicating comparability.②On day 1 of initiated enteral nutrition,there were no significant differences in infection,inflammation,immunity and nutrition indicators between the two groups.On day 3 of initiated enteral nutrition,the hs-CRP in the test group was lower than that control group,LYM and PA were higher than those control group[hs-CRP(mg/L):129.60±75.18 vs.185.20±63.74,LYM:1.00±0.84 vs.0.60±0.41,PA(mg/L):27.30±3.66 vs.22.30±2.55,all P<0.05].On day 5 of initiated enteral nutrition,the hs-CRP,Neut%,PCT in the test group were lower than those control group,LYM and PA were higher than those control group[hs-CRP(mg/L):101.70±54.32 vs.148.40±36.35,Neut%:(85.50±7.66)%vs.(92.90±6.01)%,PCT(μg/L):0.7(0.3,2.7)vs.3.6(1.2,7.5),LYM:1.00±0.68 vs.0.50±0.38,PA(mg/L):27.10±4.57 vs.20.80±3.51,all P<0.05].There were no significantly differences in IL-6 and RBP between the two groups at different time points.③ The proportion of 50%and 70%of achieved target energy in the test group on day 3,day 5 of initiated enteral nutrition were higher than those of the control group(70.0%vs.36.4%,70.0%vs.36.4%,both P<0.05).④The incidence of reflux/aspiration and VAP in the test group on day 5 of initiated enteral nutrition were significantly lower than those control group(incidence of reflux/aspiration:5.0%vs.28.6%,incidence of VAP:10.0%vs.36.4%,both P<0.05).Conclusion Dynamic monitoring of GRV by bedside ultrasound can accurately improve the proportion of 50%of achieved target energy on day 3 and 75%on day 5 in severe mechanical ventilation patients,improve the patient's inflammation,immune and nutritional status,and can prevent the occurrence of reflux/aspiration and VAP.

Bedside ultrasoundGastric residual volumeMechanical ventilationEnteral nutritionTarget energy

杨红晓、马金兰、陈静、李桂芳、丁欢

展开 >

宁夏医科大学总医院重症医学科,银川 750004

宁夏医科大学总医院康复医学科,银川 750004

床旁超声 胃残余量 机械通气 肠内营养 目标能量

宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目

2022BEG03125

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(2)
  • 19