首页|脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案的构建及应用

脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案的构建及应用

扫码查看
目的 构建脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案并探讨其临床应用效果。方法 ①构建脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案:成立课题小组,负责文献回顾、专家遴选、编制与收发问卷,对专家意见进行整理、统计与分析,并对研究全程质量控制等。于 2022 年 10 月至 11 月开展专家函询,问卷均通过现场填写与微信形式发放和收回。采用李克特量表 5 级评分法(Likert 5)对各条目评分。②方案临床应用:回顾性选择2022 年 1 月至 7 月收治于新疆医科大学第一附属医院重症监护病房(ICU)的 90 例脓毒症患者作为对照组,采用常规的脓毒症集束化治疗与护理策略。前瞻性选择 2023 年 1 月至 7 月收治的 90 例脓毒症患者作为干预组,在对照组治疗与护理策略的基础上,采用德尔菲函询法构建的脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案。比较两组患者 1h、3 h、6 h集束化治疗(bundle)完成率,治疗 1、3、7 d炎症指标变化水平,以及预后指标的差异。结果 ①构建脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案:最终形成的方案包含 4 项一级指标、15 项二级指标和 34 项三级指标。共进行两轮专家函询,两轮函询问卷回收率均为 100%;专家权威值系数分别为 0。948、0。940;各项目的变异系数分别为 0~0。287、0~0。187;肯德尔和谐系数(Kendall's W)分别为 0。242、0。249,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。②方案临床应用:两组患者年龄、性别、感染部位、病原菌种类、机械通气时间、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)及急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)等基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义。干预组 1 h、3 h、6 h bundle完成率均高于对照组(1 h bundle完成率:53。30%比 21。10%,3 h bundle完成率:92。20%比 80。00%,6 h bundle完成率:88。89%比 65。56%,均P<0。05)。两组患者C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、降钙素原(PCT)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平在组内不同时间点、组间及交互效应中差异均有统计学意义。与对照组相比,干预组ICU住院时间明显缩短[d:7。00(4。00,14。00)比 8。00(7。00,20。00),P<0。01],ICU住院费用明显降低[万元:4。63(3。36,6。19)比 6。46(3。32,11。34),P<0。05]。干预组 28d病死率虽低于对照组(33。33%比 46。67%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 构建的脓毒症集束化治疗管理与实践方案能够提高集束化治疗完成率,缩短脓毒症患者ICU住院时间,减少ICU住院费用,并有降低28d病死率的趋势。
Construction and application of sepsis bundle therapy management and practice program
Objective To construct a bundled therapy management and practice program for sepsis and explore its clinical application effect.Methods ①Construction of sepsis bundled therapy management and practice program:a project team was established to conduct literature review,select experts,compile and distribute questionnaires,organize,analyze expert opinions,and ensure quality control throughout the research process.From October to November 2022,expert letter consultation was carried out,and questionnaires were distributed and collected by on-site filling and WeChat.The Likert 5-point scale was used to rate each item.② Clinical application of the protocol:ninety patients with sepsis admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU)of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January to July 2022 were retrospectively selected as the control group,and routine bundle treatment and nursing strategy for sepsis were adopted.Ninety patients with sepsis admitted from January to July 2023 were prospectively selected as the intervention group.Based on the treatment and nursing strategy of the control group,sepsis bundled therapy management and practice program constructed using the Delphi inquiry method was implemented.The completion rate of 1-hour,3-hour and 6-hour bundle,the levels of inflammatory indicators at 1,3,7 days of treatment,and prognostic indicators were compared between the two groups.Results ①Construction of sepsis bundled therapy management and practice program:the final plan consists of 4 primary indicators,15 secondary indicators and 34 tertiary indicators.The response rates for both rounds of inquiry questionnaires were 100%.The coefficients of expert authority value were 0.948 and 0.940,respectively.The coefficient of variation for each item was 0-0.287 and 0-0.187,respectively.Kendall's W coefficients were 0.242 and 0.249,respectively,with statistical significances(all P<0.05).②Clinical application of the protocol:there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age,gender,infection site,pathogen species,duration of mechanical ventilation,sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)between the two groups.The completion rate of 1-hour,3-hour and 6-hour bundle in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group(1-hour bundle completion rate:53.30%vs.21.10%,3-hour bundle completion rate:92.20%vs.80.00%,6-hour bundle completion rate:88.89%vs.65.56%,all P<0.05).The levels of C-reactive protein(CRP),white blood cell count(WBC),procalcitonin(PCT),and interleukin-6(IL-6)in two groups of patients showed statistically significant differences at different time points,between groups,and in interaction effects.Compared with the control group,the length of ICU stay in the intervention group was significantly shortened[days:7.00(4.00,14.00)vs.8.00(7.00,20.00),P<0.01],and the hospitalization cost of ICU was significantly reduced[ten thousand yuan:4.63(3.36,6.19)vs.6.46(3.32,11.34),P<0.05].The 28-day mortality in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group(33.33%vs.46.67%),but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions The constructed bundled therapy management and practice program for sepsis can improve the completion rate of bundle treatment,shorten the length of ICU stay of sepsis patients,reduce the hospitalization cost in ICU,and have a tendency to reduce the 28-day mortality.

SepsisBundle treatmentDelphi correspondencePrognosis

杨延洁、辜新、彭虎、杨羚、于湘友、张莉

展开 >

新疆医科大学护理学院,乌鲁木齐 830000

新疆医科大学第一附属医院重症医学中心,乌鲁木齐 830000

脓毒症 集束化治疗 德尔菲函询 预后

吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金

320.6750.2023-02-32017D01C308

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)
  • 21