首页|以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚分数比值为导向的风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机的预测价值

以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚分数比值为导向的风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机的预测价值

扫码查看
目的 通过超声评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)患者的膈肌运动指标,探讨以呼吸频率与膈肌增厚分数比值(RR/DTF)为导向的风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机的预测价值。方法 回顾性选择 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月入住锦州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科接受无创机械通气(NIV)治疗的 64 例AECOPD患者,根据 24h内NIV上机结局将患者分为NIV成功组和NIV失败组,比较两组患者接受NIV2h后RR/DTF、膈肌活动度(DE)、潮气量(VT)、呼吸频率(RR)、pH值、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)以及是否存在排痰障碍等临床指标。将上述影响NIV失败的因素纳入二分类Logistic回归分析,建立风险预测模型;采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)分析该模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机的预测价值。结果 64 例AECOPD患者中NIV成功 43 例,NIV失败 21 例;两组患者年龄、性别、体质量指数(BMI)、氧合指数(P/F)、吸烟史、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)等基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义,具有可比性。与NIV成功组比较,NIV失败组RR/DTF、RR、PaCO2、排痰障碍比例显著升高,VT、DE显著降低[RR/DTF(%):1。00±0。18 比 0。89±0。22,RR(次/min):21。64±3。13 比19。62±2。98,PaCO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0。133 kPa):70。82±8。82 比 65。29±9。47,排痰障碍:57。1%比 30。2%,VT(mL):308。09±14。89 比 324。48±23。82,DE(mm):19。91±2。94 比 22。05±3。30,均P<0。05]。二分类多因素Logistic回归分析显示,RR/DTF[优势比(OR)=147。989,95%可信区间(95%CI)为 3。321~595。412,P=0。010]、RR(OR=1。296,95%CI为 1。006~1。670,P=0。045)、VT(OR=0。966,95%CI为 0。935~0。999,P=0。044)、PaCO2(OR=1。086,95%CI为 1。006~1。173,P=0。035)、排痰障碍(OR=4。533,95%CI为 1。025~20。049,P=0。046)为AECOPD患者NIV失败的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示,以上述影响因素构建的风险预测模型预测AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0。713,95%CI为 0。587~0。839(P=0。005);敏感度为 72。73%,特异度为 88。10%,约登指数为 0。394,最佳截断值为 0。87。结论 以RR/DTF为导向的风险预测模型对AECOPD患者无创-有创机械通气治疗切换时机具有良好的预测价值。
Predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragmatic thickening fraction for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pul
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of a risk prediction model guided by the ratio of respiratory rate to diaphragm thickening fraction(RR/DTF)for noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition timing in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD),through ultrasound evaluation of diaphragm movement indicators.Methods Sixty-four patients diagnosed with AECOPD and undergoing non-invasive ventilation(NIV),who were admitted to the department of critical care medicine of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023 were enrolled.They were divided into NIV successful group and NIV failure group based on the outcome of NIV within 24 hours.Clinical indicators such as RR/DTF,diaphragmatic excursion(DE),tidal volume(VT),respiratory rate(RR),pH value,partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),and sputum excretion disorder were compared between the two groups after 2 hours of NIV.The factors influencing NIV failure were included in binary Logistic regression analysis,and an RR/DTF oriented risk prediction model was established.Receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve)analysis was used to assess the predictive value of this model for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.Results Among 64 patients with AECOPD,with 43 in the NIV successful group and 21 in the NIV failure group.There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data such as age,gender,body mass index(BMI),oxygenation index(P/F),smoking history,and acute physiological and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ)between the two groups of patients,indicating comparability.Compared to the NIV successful group,the NIV failure group showed a significantly increase in RR/DTF,RR,PaCO2,and sputum retention,while VT and DE were significantly decreased[RR/DTF(%):1.00±0.18 vs.0.89±0.22,RR(bpm):21.64±3.13 vs.19.62±2.98,PaCO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):70.82±8.82 vs.65.29±9.47,sputum retention:57.1%vs.30.2%,VT(mL):308.09±14.89 vs.324.48±23.82,DE(mm):19.91±2.94 vs.22.05±3.30,all P<0.05].Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that RR/DTF[odds ratio(OR)=147.989,95%confidence interval(95%CI)was 3.321-595.412,P=0.010],RR(OR=1.296,95%CI was 1.006-1.670,P=0.045),VT(OR=0.966,95%CI was 0.935-0.999,P=0.044),PaCO2(OR=1.086,95%CI was 1.006~1.173,P=0.035),and sputum retention(OR=4.533,95%CI was 1.025-20.049,P=0.046)were independent risk factors for predicting NIV failure in AECOPD patients.ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC)of 0.713 with a 95%CI of 0.587-0.839(P=0.005).The sensitivity was 72.73%,the specificity was 88.10%,the Youden index was 0.394,and the optimal cut-off value was 0.87.Conclusion The RR/DTF risk prediction model has good predictive value for the timing of noninvasive-invasive mechanical ventilation transition in AECOPD patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDiaphragm ultrasoundNon-invasive ventilationRisk prediction

李晓东、李甜、邸兴伟、刘敬禹

展开 >

锦州医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科,辽宁锦州 121000

锦州医科大学附属第三医院呼吸与危重症医学科,辽宁锦州 121000

慢性阻塞性肺疾病 膈肌超声 无创机械通气 风险预测

辽宁省教育厅自然科学研究项目

jytms20231728

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(5)
  • 16