首页|脓毒症急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者急性胃肠功能损伤的临床特征及预后分析

脓毒症急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者急性胃肠功能损伤的临床特征及预后分析

扫码查看
目的 观察脓毒症急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)合并急性胃肠功能损伤(AGI)不同分级患者的临床特征及预后,进一步探讨患者不良预后的相关危险因素。方法 收集2023年3月至10月天津市第一中心医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的脓毒症ARDS患者的临床资料。根据 2012 年欧洲重症医学协会AGI定义及分级标准,将患者分为AGI 0~Ⅳ级组。观察患者的临床特征及 28d临床结局;采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归法分析脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者预后的相关危险因素;绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)和校准曲线,评估各危险因素对脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者预后的预测价值。结果 共纳入 92 例脓毒症ARDS患者,其中AGI 0 级组 7 例、AGIⅠ级组 20 例、AGIⅡ级组 38 例、AGIⅢ级组 23 例、AGIⅣ级组 4 例,AGI发生率为 92。39%。随AGI分级增加,ARDS分级越高,急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)、序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、腹内压(IAP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞计数(NEU)、淋巴细胞计数(LYM)、淋巴细胞比例(LYM%)、28 d病死率均呈明显升高趋势,氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)呈明显降低趋势(均P<0。05)。Pearson相关分析显示,APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分和ARDS分级与患者AGI分级呈显著正相关(Pearson相关性指数分别为0。386、0。473、0。372,均P<0。001),PaO2/FiO2 与患者AGI分级呈显著负相关(Pearson相关性指数为-0。425,P<0。001)。脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者中,28 d存活 68 例,28 d死亡 17 例。存活组与死亡组APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分、ARDS分级、AGI分级、PaO2/FiO2、IAP、AGI 7 d最差值、ICU住院时间及总住院时间比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0。05)。单因素Logistic回归分析显示,SOFA评分[优势比(OR)=1。350,95%可信区间(95%CI)为 1。071~1。702,P=0。011]、PaO2/FiO2(OR=0。964,95%CI为 0。933~0。996,P=0。027)和AGI7d最差值(OR=2。103,95%CI为 1。194~3。702,P=0。010)是脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者 28d死亡的危险因素。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,SOFA评分(OR=1。384,95%CI为1。153~1。661,P<0。001)、PaO2/FiO2(OR=0。983,95%CI为 0。968~0。999,P=0。035)和AGI7d最差值(OR=1。992,95%CI为 1。141~3。478,P=0。015)是脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者 28d死亡的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示,SOFA评分、PaO2/FiO2 和AGI7d最差值对脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者 28d预后均有一定预测价值,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0。824(95%CI为0。697~0。950)、0。760(95%CI为 0。642~0。877)和 0。721(95%CI为 0。586~0。857),均P<0。01;当上述指标最佳截断值分别为 5。50 分、163。45 mmHg(1 mmHg≈0。133 kPa)、2。50 级时,敏感度分别为 94。1%、94。1%、31。9%,特异度分别为 80。9%、67。6%、88。2%。结论 脓毒症ARDS患者AGI的发生率约为 90%,AGI分级越高患者预后越差,SOFA评分、PaO2/FiO2 和AGI7d最差值对脓毒症ARDS合并AGI患者的预后均有一定的预测价值,其中SOFA评分和AGI7d最差值越大、PaO2/FiO2 越小,患者病死率越高。
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of acute gastrointestinal injury in patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome
Objective To observe the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)in sepsis combined with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)of different grades,and to further explore the risk factors associated with the poor prognosis of patients.Methods The clinical data of patients with septic ARDS admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU)of Tianjin First Central Hospital from March to October 2023 were collected.According to the 2012 European Association of Critical Care Medicine AGI definition and grading criteria,the patients were categorized into AGI grade 0-Ⅳgroups.The clinical characteristics and 28-day clinical outcomes of the patients were observed;the risk factors related to the prognosis of patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate Logistic regression;and the receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC curve)and calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the predictive value of each risk factor on the prognosis of patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI.Results A total of 92 patients with septic ARDS were enrolled,including 7 patients in the AGI 0 group,20 patients in the AGIⅠgroup,38 patients in the AGIⅡgroup,23 patients in the AGIⅢgroup,and 4 patients in the AGI Ⅳ group.The incidence of AGI was 92.39% .With the increase of AGI grade,the ARDS grade increased,and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ),sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA),intra-abdominal pressure(IAP),white blood cell count(WBC),neutrophil count(NEU),lymphocyte count(LYM),lymphocyte percentage(LYM% ),and 28-day mortality all showed a significant increasing trend,while the oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2)showed a significant decreasing trend(all P<0.05).Pearson correlation analysis showed that APACHEⅡscore,SOFA score,and ARDS classification were positively correlated with patients'AGI grade(Pearson correlation index was 0.386,0.473,and 0.372,respectively,all P<0.001),and PaO2/FiO2 was negatively correlated with patients'AGI grade(Pearson correlation index was-0.425,P<0.001).Among the patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI,there were 68 survivors and 17 deaths at 28 days.The differences in APACHEⅡscore,SOFA score,ARDS grade,AGI grade,PaO2/FiO2,IAP,AGI 7-day worst value,length of ICU stay,and total length of hospital stay between the survival and death groups were statistically significant.Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that SOFA score[odds ratio(OR)=1.350,95% confidence interval(95% CI)was 1.071-1.702,P=0.011],PaO2/FiO2(OR=0.964,95% CI was 0.933-0.996,P=0.027)and AGI 7-day worst value(OR=2.103,95% CI was 1.194-3.702,P=0.010)were the risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that SOFA score(OR=1.384,95% CI was 1.153-1.661,P<0.001),PaO2/FiO2(OR=0.983,95% CI was 0.968-0.999,P=0.035)and AGI 7-day worst value(OR=1.992,95% CI was 1.141-3.478,P=0.015)were the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI.ROC curve analysis showed that SOFA score,PaO2/FiO2 and AGI 7-day worst value had predictive value for the 28-day prognosis of patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI.The area under the ROC curve(AUC)was 0.824(95% CI was 0.697-0.950),0.760(95% CI was 0.642-0.877)and 0.721(95% CI was 0.586-0.857),respectively,all P<0.01;when the best cut-off values of the above metrics were 5.50 points,163.45 mmHg(1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa),and 2.50 grade,the sensitivities were 94.1%,94.1%,31.9%,respectively,and the specificities were 80.9%,67.6%,88.2%,respectively.Conclusions The incidence of AGI in patients with septic ARDS is about 90%,and the higher the AGI grade,the worse the prognosis of the patients.SOFA score,PaO2/FiO2 and AGI 7-day worst value have a certain predictive value for the prognosis of patients with septic ARDS combined with AGI,among which,the larger the SOFA score and AGI 7-day worst value,and the smaller the PaO2/FiO2,the higher the patients'mortality.

Acute gastrointestinal injuryAcute respiratory distress syndromeSepsisPrognosis

许华、赵洋、朱辰林、许力井、高红梅

展开 >

天津市第一中心医院重症医学科,国家卫生健康委员会危重病急救医学重点实验室,天津市急救医学研究所,天津 300192

天津医科大学一中心临床学院,天津 300190

南开大学一中心临床学院,天津 300071

急性胃肠功能损伤 急性呼吸窘迫综合征 脓毒症 预后

天津市医学重点学科建设项目天津市科技计划项目天津市科技计划项目天津市卫生健康科技项目天津市卫生健康科技项目

TJYXZDXK-013A21JCYBJC0009022JCQNJC00420ZC20012TJWJ2022XK023

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(6)