首页|机械通气患者机械功率暴露强度和持续时间的可视化方法

机械通气患者机械功率暴露强度和持续时间的可视化方法

扫码查看
目的 利用可视化方法展现机械通气患者不同机械功率暴露强度-持续时间组合与死亡风险之间的关系。方法 从美国重症监护医学信息数据库Ⅳv1。0(MIMIC-Ⅳv1。0)中筛选出接受机械通气的危重病患者,并根据氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)分为 4 个亚组,即>300 mmHg(1 mmHg≈0。133 kPa)组、201~300 mmHg组、101~200 mmHg组、≤100 mmHg组。收集不同患者人群的基线特征、呼吸机参数及预后指标。对每位患者均使用从低到高的机械功率阈值(5~30 J/min,以 1 J/min为间隔递增)评估不同机械功率的暴露情况(高于设定阈值即记录为 1 次暴露),并根据其对应的持续时间,统计不同暴露强度-持续时间组合的事件次数。根据患者28d存活/死亡情况,分别计算存活者和死亡者在每种暴露强度-持续时间组合下的暴露次数,并根据暴露次数计算不同机械功率暴露强度-持续时间组合的生存优势比(OR)。以暴露持续时间为横坐标、暴露强度为纵坐标,生成二维表格,并利用热图及其相应等位线视图实现OR值的可视化,从而评估死亡风险。结果 最终共纳入5 378 例接受机械通气的患者,PaO2/FiO2>300 mmHg组 2 069 例,201~300 mmHg组 813 例,101~200 mmHg组1 493例,≤100 mmHg组1 003例。随着PaO2/FiO2 下降,患者病情严重程度评分[序贯器官衰竭评分(SOFA)、简化急性生理学评分Ⅱ(SAPSⅡ)]逐渐升高,合并症比例也呈上升趋势。在呼吸机参数方面,随着PaO2/FiO2下降,患者机械功率逐渐增加[分别为 10。4(7。8,13。9)、11。3(8。5,14。7)、13。6(10。0,18。2)、16。7(12。5,22。0)J/min,P<0。01];在预后方面,随着PaO2/FiO2 下降,患者28d病死率逐渐升高[分别为29。1%(601/2069)、26。9%(219/813)、28。1%(420/1 493)、33。3%(334/1 003),P<0。05]。在可视化热图中观察到,机械通气患者28d死亡风险随着机械功率暴露强度增大和持续时间延长而逐渐增加,表现为两个差异明显的区域:靠近左下角的区域(机械功率暴露强度低、持续时间短)呈蓝色,代表生存优势大;靠近右上角的区域(机械功率暴露强度高、持续时间长)呈红色,代表死亡风险大。根据OR值拟合得到的等位线可见,在死亡风险相同的情况下,机械功率暴露强度较高时所需持续时间较短,而较低的机械功率暴露强度则需要较长的持续时间。上述变化趋势在整体人群及不同氧合人群中均有类似体现。结论 更高暴露强度和(或)更长持续时间的机械功率与机械通气患者不良临床结局相关。同时考虑机械功率的暴露强度和持续时间,有助于评估机械通气患者肺保护的实施效果,并指导机械通气策略的调整,以达到减少呼吸机相关性肺损伤发生的目的。
Visualization method of mechanical power exposure intensity and duration in mechanical ventilation patients
Objective To visualize the relationship between different combinations of mechanical power exposure intensity-duration and death risk in mechanical ventilation patients using a visualization method.Methods Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation were selected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅳv1.0(MIMIC-Ⅳv1.0)database.The patients were divided into four subgroups according to oxygenation index(PaO2/FiO2)including>300 mmHg(1 mmHg ≈ 0.133 kPa)group,201-300 mmHg group,101-200 mmHg group and≤100 mmHg group.The baseline characteristics,ventilator parameters,and prognostic indicators for different patient populations were collected.For each patient,the mechanical power thresholds from low to high(5-30 J/min,increasing at intervals of 1 J/min)were used to evaluate the different exposures of mechanical power(above the set threshold was recorded as one exposure),and the number of events with different exposure intensity-duration combinations was counted based on their corresponding durations.Based on the 28-day survival/non-survival status,the number of exposures for survivors and non-survivors in each exposure intensity-duration combination was calculated,and the survival odds ratio(OR)for different mechanical power exposure intensity-duration combinations was subsequently computed.Two-dimensional tables were generated with mechanical power exposure duration on the x-axis and exposure intensity on the y-axis,and the heatmap and its corresponding equipotential line view were used to visualize the OR value to assess the risk of death.Results A total of 5378 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled in the study,of whom 2 069 patients in the PaO2/FiO2>300 mmHg group,813 patients in the 201-300 mmHg group,1 493 patients in the 101-200 mmHg group,and 1 003 patients in the≤100 mmHg group.The severity scores of patients,including sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score and simplified acute physiology scoreⅡ(SAPSⅡ),gradually increased following the decrease in PaO2/FiO2,and the incidence of co-morbidities also gradually increased.In terms of ventilator parameters,mechanical power was increased gradually with decrease in PaO2/FiO2,measuring 10.4(7.8,13.9),11.3(8.5,14.7),13.6(10.0,18.2),and 16.7(12.5,22.0)J/min(P<0.01).In terms of prognosis,28-day mortality of patients was gradually increased with decrease in PaO2/FiO2[29.1%(601/2 069),26.9%(219/813),28.1%(420/1 493),and 33.3%(334/1 003),respectively,P<0.05].In the heatmap,it could be observed that the 28-day death risk of mechanical ventilation patients was gradually increased with increase in mechanical power exposure intensity and long duration,showing two distinct areas:a region near the bottom left corner(representing low mechanical power exposure intensity and short duration)was blue,indicating a greater chance of survival.In contrast,another region near the top right corner(representing high mechanical power exposure intensity and long duration)was red,indicating a higher risk of death.According to the fitted lines of death risk,for the same risk of death,a shorter mechanical power exposure duration was required for higher exposure intensity,while lower mechanical power exposure intensity required a longer exposure duration.The above trend of change was similarly reflected in the overall population and different oxygenation populations.Conclusions Cumulative mechanical power exposure to higher intensity and/or longer duration is associated with worse outcomes in mechanical ventilation patients.Considering both the mechanical power exposure intensity and duration may help to evaluate the effectiveness of lung protection in mechanical ventilation patients and guide adjustments in mechanical ventilation strategy to reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury.

Mechanical powerMechanical ventilationRespiratory failureMedical Information Mart for Intensive Care-ⅣMortality

张婧茹、陈志中、龚书榕、陈晗

展开 >

福建医科大学基础医学院,福州 350122

福建省福昕软件开发股份有限公司,福州 350003

福建医科大学省立临床医学院(福建省立医院)重症医学科,福建省疑难重症研究重点实验室,福建省重症医学中心,福州 350001

机械功率 机械通气 呼吸衰竭 美国重症监护医学信息数据库Ⅳ 病死率

福建省卫生健康委科技项目

2021GGA002

2024

中华危重病急救医学
中华医学会

中华危重病急救医学

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:3.049
ISSN:2095-4352
年,卷(期):2024.36(7)