Comparative Study on emergent coronary intervention via arteria radialis or femoral
Objective To observe the safety and feasibility of emergent coronary intervention percutaneous radial in a-cute myocardial infarction! AMI) through comparative study on emergent coronary intervention via arteria radialis or femoral. Method 52 cases diagnosed AMI in our hospital and treated by PCI from January 2008 to March 2010 were divided into two groups random: radial approach group(n = 24)and femoral approach group(n= 28). The success rate,time set Sheath,operating time and complication rate were compared. Results The success rate of PCI were 100% all, the operating time was(54. 7±18. 3) mins in radial approach group and (51.5±17.2) mins in femoral approach group,and there was no statistical difference between two groups(P>0.05). Time set Sheath in femoral approach group was shorter than that in radial approach group, and there was statistical difference (P < 0. 05), but prognosis were not effected significtly. complications after operation (Local arteria radialisaematoma. pseudoaneu-rysm. vasovagal reaction) in radial approach group was less than that in femoral approach group and there is statistical difference between two groups (P>0. 05). Conclusion The emergent PCI through radial approach is safe and effective. The complications in radial approach group is lower compared with that in femoral approach group and it can be conventional means in emergent PCI.
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
维普
