中国消毒学杂志2024,Vol.41Issue(2) :113-115.DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2024.02.010

广东省新冠病毒感染疫情期间现场消毒效果评价与分析

Analysis and evaluation of field disinfection effect in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 epidemic period

张磊 何炽明 肖微 吴海游 陈盛龙 谭丽容 梁宇恒 钟昱文 张贤昌
中国消毒学杂志2024,Vol.41Issue(2) :113-115.DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2024.02.010

广东省新冠病毒感染疫情期间现场消毒效果评价与分析

Analysis and evaluation of field disinfection effect in Guangdong Province during COVID-19 epidemic period

张磊 1何炽明 1肖微 1吴海游 1陈盛龙 1谭丽容 1梁宇恒 1钟昱文 2张贤昌3
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 广东省生物制品与药物研究所,广东广州 510440
  • 2. 广东省疾病预防控制中心
  • 3. 广东省生物制品与药物研究所,广东广州 510440;广东省疾病预防控制中心
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 了解广东省新冠病毒感染疫情期间现场消毒效果评价工作的实施情况.方法 2021年11月—2022年7月,参与45个场所的现场消毒效果评价,以自然菌或指示微生物的杀灭率为指标评价物体表面和空气消毒效果.结果 45个受检机构累计完成34次预防性和92次疫源地消毒现场消毒效果评价.预防性消毒的物体表面消毒合格率为61.8%,空气消毒合格率为100%.疫源地消毒的物体表面合格率为90.2%,其中冷链场所合格率最高,为97.4%,空气消毒合格率为100%.物体表面消毒主要使用含氯消毒剂、二氧化氯和季铵盐,合格率分别为97.3%、87.5%和75.0%,空气消毒主要是用过氧化物类消毒剂,其合格率为89.3%.冷链消毒使用的含氯消毒剂和二氧化氯的备案率分别为72.7%和36.4%.结论 广东省重点行业和领域能够按程序规范开展现场消毒效果评价工作,但部分实践细节工作需要进一步完善和改进.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the implementation of field disinfection effect evaluation during the COVID-19 epidemic period in Guangdong Province.Methods From November 2021 to July 2022,the field disinfection effect evaluation were carried in 45 sites.Disinfection effect on surface and air were evaluated by the killing rate of natural bacteria or indicator microorganisms.Results 34 preventive disinfection evaluations and 92 epidemic focus disinfection were carried out.The average qualified rate of disinfection effect evaluation on preventive disinfection were 61.8%on hard surface and 100%on air.On hard surface disinfection,the average qualified rate of evaluation of epidemic focus disinfection was 90.2%,and that on logistics enterprises,cold chain sites,airlines and other sites were 76.9%,97.4%,64.7%and 83.3%,respectively.Disinfection was mainly conducted with chlorine containing disinfectant,chlorine dioxide and quaternary ammonium salt with qualified rates of 97.3%,87.5%and 75%.Qualified rate of disinfection effect evaluation on air was 89.3%.The filing rates of disinfectants of chlorine and chlorine dioxide used in cold-chain disinfection were 72.7%and 36.4%.Conclusion Most of key industries and fields in Guangdong Province can carry out field disinfection effect evaluation according to procedures and specifications,but part of detials need to be improved in practice.

关键词

现场消毒/效果评价/预防性消毒/疫源地消毒/消毒剂

Key words

field disinfection/effect evaluation/preventive disinfection/disinfection of epidemic focus/disinfectant

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

广东省医学科研项目(B2020139)

广东省医学科研项目(B2021119)

广东省重点领域研发计划(2019B111103001)

广州市科技计划(202102080124)

广州市科技计划(202201010800)

出版年

2024
中国消毒学杂志
军事医学科学院疾病预防控制所,中华预防医学会

中国消毒学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.754
ISSN:1001-7658
参考文献量11
段落导航相关论文