首页|2种医院感染现患率调查方法调查结果分析

2种医院感染现患率调查方法调查结果分析

扫码查看
目的 比较传统人工调查和信息化调查2种医院感染现患率调查方法的调查结果,为进一步改进现患率调查方法提供参考依据.方法 选取某院2018年11月28日所有住院患者为研究对象,比较2种医院感染现患率调查方法的调查结果,确定更佳的现患率调查方法.结果 此次调查住院患者2 239例,所得医院感染现患率分别为3.22%和2.90%.传统人工调查和信息化调查所得结果基本一致.信息化调查的特异度、总符合率、阳性预测值和阳性似然比均高于传统人工调查.结论 现患率调查以信息化调查为主,通过人工调查进行质控,有利于进一步提高医院感染监测水平.
Analysis of the survey results of two methods for nosocomial infection prevalence survey
Objective To compare the survey results of two methods of nosocomial infection prevalence survey,and to provide a reference for further improving the prevalence survey method.Methods All hospitalized patients in a hospital on November 28,2018 were selected as the research subjects,and the results of two methods for nosocomial infection prevalence survey were compared to determine a better prevalence survey method.Results This survey included 2 239 hospitalized patients.The prevalence rates of nosocomial infection obtained from traditional manual survey and information-based survey were 3.22%and 2.90%,respectively.The results obtained by traditional manual survey and information-based survey were basically the same.The specificity,total coincidence rate,positive predictive value,and positive likelihood ratio of information-based survey were all higher than those of traditional manual survey.Conclusion The prevalence survey is mainly based on information-based survey,and the quality control through manual survey is helpful to further improve the level of hospital infection surveillance.

nosocomial infectionprevalence surveymanual surveyinformation-based survey

何倩、赵红、张士杰、徐玉菲、李晓娜

展开 >

安徽中医药大学第一附属医院,安徽合肥 230031

医院感染 现患率调查 人工调查 信息化调查

安徽省自然科学基金

1908085QC90

2024

中国消毒学杂志
军事医学科学院疾病预防控制所,中华预防医学会

中国消毒学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.754
ISSN:1001-7658
年,卷(期):2024.41(4)
  • 17