Cost-utility Analysis of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Combination Therapies as First-line Treatment for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
OBJECTIVE To compare the cost-utility of eight programmed death 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1(PD-L1)inhibitor combination regimens for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.METHODS Relevant data were derived from a published network meta-analysis and randomized controlled trails,a three-state Markov model was established to analyze the cost-utility of eight immunotherapy combinations.The robustness of results were validated through sensitivity analyses and a series of scenario analyses was also conducted.RESULTS The incremental cost-utility ratio(ICUR)of the sintilizumab plus chemotherapy group and the tislelizumab plus chemotherapy group were ¥ 125 143.88/quality adjusted life year(QALY)and ¥ 189 609.64/QALY,respectively,which were less than the willingness-to-pay(WTP)threshold of ¥ 257 094/QALY,and all the ICURs of other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination regimens exceeded the WTP threshold and were not economical.Scenario analyses found that even if the medical insurance reimbursement ratio reached 80%,the different combinations of pembrolizumab,nivolumab and atezolizumab were not economical.CONCLUSION Compared with other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination regimens,sintilizumab plus chemotherapy and tislelizumab plus chemotherapy have cost-utility advantages in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC,which can provide a certain reference for selecting a reasonable treatment plan for NSCLC patients.