首页|Y型网片与非网片用于腹腔镜下阴道骶骨固定术的临床疗效比较

Y型网片与非网片用于腹腔镜下阴道骶骨固定术的临床疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较Y型网片和非网片用于腹腔镜下阴道骶骨固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2021年7月至2022年9月山西医科大学第二医院收治的80例因症状性POP行腹腔镜下阴道骶骨固定术治疗的患者的临床资料,其中应用Y型网片患者纳入网片组,应用不可吸收线患者纳入非网片组,各40例.对两组围术期有关指标、术后并发症和术后生存质量进行对比分析.结果 网片组患者手术时长及住院花费均高于非网片组(P<0.05).在6个月的随访期内,两组患者盆腔器官脱垂量化分期(POP-Q)各个点均较术前有所改善(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后6个月随访时网片组有2例网片暴露,非网片组未见缝线暴露;两组术后压力性尿失禁的新发率无显著差异(P>0.05).术后6个月,两组患者盆底功能障碍性疾病症状问卷-20(PDFI-20)及女性性功能指数量表-6(FSFI-6)评分均较术前改善(P<0.05).结论 Y型网片与非网片治疗POP均为安全、有效的术式,可以改善患者生活质量,且手术安全性高、术后并发症较少.Y型网片花费高,术后性生活满意度高,适合性活跃的年轻患者,而非网片更适用于高龄且合并多种疾病的患者,其对缩短手术时间有好处,且费用低.
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of Y-mesh and non-mesh for laparoscopic vaginal sacral fixation
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic vaginal sacral fixation utilizing Y-mesh and non-mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse(POP).Methods The clinical data of 80 patients who underwent laparoscopic vaginal sacral fixation for symptomatic POP admitted to the Shanxi Medical University Second Hospital from July 2021 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients who received Y-mesh were included into mesh group and patients who received nonabsorbable sutures were included into non-mesh group,with 40 cases each.Perioperative indexes,postoperative complications and postoperative quality of life were compared and analyzed between the two groups.Results The operation time and hospitalization cost of patients in the mesh group were higher than those in the non-mesh group(P<0.05).During the 6-month follow-up period,each point of pelvic organ prolapse quantitative staging(POP-Q)all improved in both groups compared with the preoperative period(P<0.05),but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).There were two cases of mesh exposure in the mesh group and no suture exposure in the non-mesh group at the 6-month postoperative follow-up;there was no significant difference in the new incidence rate of postoperative stress urinary incontinence between the two groups(P>0.05).At 6 months after surgery,the pelvic floor istress nventory-20(PDFI-20)and female sexual function index scale-6(FSFI-6)scores of patients in both groups improved compared with the preoperative period(P<0.05).Conclusions Both Y-mesh and non-mesh are a safe and effective procedures that can improve patients'quality of life with high surgical safety and fewer postoperative complications.Y-mesh is costly and has high postoperative sexual satisfaction,which is suitable for sexually active young patients,while non-mesh is more suitable for older patients with a combination of multiple disorders,and it is beneficial for shortening the duration of the operation time at a low cost.

Laparoscopic vaginal sacral fixationPelvic organ prolapseMeshQuality of life

孙林林、平毅

展开 >

山西医科大学,太原 030001

山西医科大学第二医院妇产科,太原 030001

腹腔镜下阴道骶骨固定术 盆腔器官脱垂 网片 生活质量

山西省医学重点科技项目

2022XM23

2024

中国性科学
中国性学会

中国性科学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.394
ISSN:1672-1993
年,卷(期):2024.33(8)
  • 8