首页|剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度对瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的影响

剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度对瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的影响

扫码查看
目的 分析剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度对瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的影响.方法 回顾性选取2020年5月至2022年5月保定市妇幼保健院收治的行超声引导下清宫术治疗的86例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者作为研究对象,根据患者术后是否再干预分为再干预组(n=32)和未再干预组(n=54).患者入院时均行磁共振成像(MRI)检查,比较两组剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度、病灶旁正常肌层厚度、胚胎大小,采用Logistic回归分析剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度、胚胎大小与瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的关系;绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估其对瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的预测价值.结果 再干预组患者剩余肌层厚度和瘢痕厚度低于未再干预组,而胚胎大小高于未再干预组(P<0.05)o多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,剩余肌层厚度≤2.89 mm(OR=2.063,95%CI:1.249~3.407)、瘢痕厚度≤3.27 mm(OR=1.893,95%CI:1.122~3.194)、胚胎大小>2.69 cm(OR=2.787,95%CI:1.406~5.524)是瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的重要影响因素(OR>1,P<0.05)o ROC曲线结果显示,剩余肌层厚度和瘢痕厚度最佳截断值为2.89 mm和3.27 mm时,预测瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.73(95%CI:0.678~0.812)和 0.75(95%CI:0.704~0.825),此时的灵敏度和特异度分别为 76.48%、78.39%和70.32%、70.33%;二者联合预测瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预的AUC为0.81(95%CI:0.746~0.859),此时的灵敏度和特异度分别为82.37%和71.42%.结论 剩余肌层厚度、瘢痕厚度降低是影响瘢痕妊娠清宫术后患者再干预的重要影响因素,二者联合对预测瘢痕妊娠清宫术患者再干预具有重要价值.
Effect of residual muscle thickness and scar thickness on re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage
Objective To analyze the effect of residual muscle thickness and scar thickness on re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage.Methods A total of 86 pregnant patients with cicatricial cesarean section scars who were admitted to Baoding Maternal and Child Health Hospital from May 2020 to May 2022 and received ultrasound-guided curettage were selected as the study objects.According to whether the patients were re-intervened after surgery,they were divided into re-intervention group(n=32)and no re-intervention group(n=54).Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)was performed on admission of all patients.The residual muscle thickness,scar thickness,normal muscle thickness adjacent to lesion and embryo size of the two groups were compared,and the relationship between the residual muscle thickness,scar thickness and embryo size on re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage was analyzed by Logistic regression analysis.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was plotted to evaluate its predictive value for re-intervention in scar pregnancy patients with curettage.Results The residual muscle thickness and scar thickness in the re-intervention group were lower than those in the no re-intervention group(P<0.05),while the embryo size was higher than that in the no re-intervention group(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the residual muscle thickness ≤2.89 mm(OR=2.063,95%CI:1.249-3.407),scar thickness ≤3.27 mm(OR=1.893,95%CI:1.122-3.194)and embryo size>2.69 cm(OR=2.787,95%CI:1.406-5.524)were important influencing factors for re-intervention in scar pregnancy patients with curettage(OR>1,P<0.05).ROC curve results showed that when the optimal cut-off values of residual muscle thickness and scar thickness were 2.89 mm and 3.27 mm,the area under curve(AUC)for predicting re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage was 0.73(95%CI:0.678-0.812)and 0.75(95%CI:0.704-0.825),the sensitivity and specificity were 76.48%,78.39%and 70.32%,70.33%,respectively.The AUC of the combined prediction for re-intervention in scar pregnancy patients with curettage was 0.81(95%CI:0.746-0.859),and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.37%and 71.42%,respectively.Conclusions The reductions of residual muscle thickness and scar thickness are important factors affecting the re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage.The combination of the two indicators has an important value in predicting the re-intervention of scar pregnancy patients with curettage.

Residual muscle thicknessScar thicknessScar pregnancy with curettagePostoperative re-interventionPredictive value

纪巧莹、王昭、马超、王玉娇、马艳芬、徐圆圆

展开 >

保定市妇幼保健院妇产科,河北保定 071000

剩余肌层厚度 瘢痕厚度 瘢痕妊娠清宫术 术后再干预 预测价值

2024

中国性科学
中国性学会

中国性科学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.394
ISSN:1672-1993
年,卷(期):2024.33(12)