一般拖延量表在中学生群体中应用的信效度检验
Reliability and validity of general procrastination scale in the application of middle school students
吴咏梅 1陈宇 1解韵加 1张计丽 1卜天一 1周佳玮 1乔正学 1杨佳润 2邱晓惠 1杨艳杰1
作者信息
- 1. 哈尔滨医科大学心理科学与健康管理中心,哈尔滨 150081
- 2. 黑龙江大学教育学院心理系,哈尔滨 150081
- 折叠
摘要
目的 检验一般拖延量表(general procrastination scale,GPS)在中学生群体中应用的信效度.方法 通过分层随机抽样,采用GPS中文版、非理性拖延量表和学业倦怠量表对哈尔滨市10 825名中学生调查,间隔4周后,4 498名学生进行了重测.使用SPSS 27.0和Mplus 8.0进行统计分析.结果 各条目区分度良好,探索性和验证性因子分析均表明,GPS为两因子结构,包含主动回避与缺乏计划两个因子,模型拟合效果较好(CFI=0.914,TLI=0.901,RMSEA=0.069,SRMR=0.072).GPS与非理性拖延量表、学业倦怠量表总分均呈正相关(r=0.753,0.677,均P＜0.001).GPS的Cronbach's α系数为0.864,折半信度为0.870,4周后的重测信度为0.756.结论 GPS在中学生群体中具有较好的信效度,为衡量中学生拖延水平和后续开展相关的研究提供了标准.
Abstract
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the general procrastination scale(GPS)in the application of middle school students.Methods The Chinese version of GPS,the irrational procrasti-nation scale(IPS),and the Maslach burnout inventory(MBI)were utilized to survey 10 825 middle school students in Harbin City through stratified random sampling,and 4 498 students were retested after 4 weeks.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0 and Mplus 8.0.Results The entries were well differen-tiated.Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that GPS was composed of two factors,including active avoidance and lack of planning.The model fit was good(CFI=0.914,TLI=0.901,RMSEA=0.069,SRMR=0.072).GPS was positively correlated with the total scores of IPS and MBI(r=0.753,0.677,both P＜0.001).The Cronbach's α coefficient of GPS was 0.864,the folded half reliability was 0.870,and the retest reliability after 4 weeks was 0.756.Conclusion The GPS has good reliability and validity among middle school students,which provides a standard for measuring the procrastination level of middle school students and carrying out related research.
关键词
一般拖延量表/中学生/因子分析/信度/效度Key words
General procrastination scale/Middle school students/Factor analysis/Reliabili-ty/Validity引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据