首页|中文版躯体变形障碍量表在大学生群体中的信效度分析

中文版躯体变形障碍量表在大学生群体中的信效度分析

扫码查看
目的 修订躯体变形障碍量表并在中国大学生群体中检验其信效度.方法 2022年10月,采用躯体变形障碍量表、体象障碍自评量表、简版外观焦虑量表、中文身体羞耻量表及简式抑郁量表对大学生进行施测,其中,样本1进行通俗度检验(n1=59),样本2进行项目分析与探索性因子分析(n2=493),样本3进行验证性因素分析(n3=457),样本4进行重测信度分析(n4=89).运用SPSS 25.0进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、信度分析、Pearson相关分析;运用AMOS 24.0进行验证性因素分析、聚敛效度分析.结果 (1)中文版躯体变形障碍量表包含病态信念、外表焦虑和过度打扮 3 个维度,且三因子模型拟合良好(x2/df=3.14,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.07);(2)中文版躯体变形障碍量表得分与体象障碍自评量表、简版外观焦虑量表、中文身体羞耻量表及简式抑郁量表得分均呈正相关(r=0.41~0.81,均P<0.01),其组合信度在0.75~0.95,平均方差抽取量在0.51~0.56;(3)信度检验发现,中文版躯体变形障碍量表的Cronbach's α系数在0.75~0.94;分半信度在0.65~0.90;重测信度在0.71~0.91(均P<0.01).结论 中文版躯体变形障碍量表在中国大学生群体中具有良好的信效度,可以作为有效的测评工具使用.
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of body dysmorphic disorder scale in Chinese college students
Objective Revise the Chinese version of body dysmorphic disorder scale(CBDDS)and test its reliability and validity in Chinese college students.Methods In October 2022,college students were surveyed with the body dysmorphic disorder scale(BDDS),the body image disorders scale(BIDS),the appearance anxiety scale-brief(AAS-B),the Chinese body shame scale(CBSS)and short-depression scale(SDS).Totally 59 college students(sample 1)were subjected to evaluate the popularity degree of the scale,493 college students(sample 2)were subjected to complete item and exploratory factor analysis,457 colle-ges students(sample 3)were subjected to complete the confirmatory factor analysis,totally 89 colleges students(sample 4)were subjected to complete the re-test reliability analysis.SPSS 25.0 software was used for item analysis,exploratory factor analysis,reliability analysis,Pearson correlation analysis.AMOS 24.0 software was used for confirmatory factor analysis,convergent validity analysis.Results(1)The CBDDS was consisted of 3 dimensions including pathological beliefs,appearance anxiety and overgrooming,and the three-factor model fitted well(x2/df=3.14,GFI=0.93,CFI=0.91,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.07).(2)The score of CBDDS was positively correlated with the score of BIDS,AAS-B,CBSS and SDS(r=0.41-0.81,all P<0.01).In addition,the composite reliability coefficients were 0.75-0.95 and AVE coefficients were 0.51-0.56.(3)The CBDDS had good internal reliability with Cronbach's α coefficients from 0.75 to 0.94,split-half reliability coefficients from 0.65 to 0.90 and re-test reliability coefficients from 0.71 to 0.91(all P<0.01).Conclusion The CBDDS has acceptable reliability and validity and can be an effective scale for Chinese college students.

College studentsBody dysmorphic disorderReliabilityValidity

彭婧琨、乌云特娜、金童林

展开 >

内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特 010022

大学生 躯体变形障碍 信度 效度

内蒙古自治区自然科学基金

2021MS03061

2024

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中华医学会 济宁医学院

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.472
ISSN:1674-6554
年,卷(期):2024.33(2)
  • 25