首页|可变优先级认知-运动双任务训练在老年2型糖尿病认知衰弱患者中的应用

可变优先级认知-运动双任务训练在老年2型糖尿病认知衰弱患者中的应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨可变优先级认知-运动双任务训练对老年2型糖尿病认知衰弱患者的应用效果.方法 于2022年9月至2023年9月,在华北理工大学附属医院内分泌科选取108例老年2型糖尿病认知衰弱住院患者作为研究对象.将患者随机分成3组,每组36人,分别使用VP认知-运动双任务训练(VP组)、序贯式运动联合认知训练(ST组)及内分泌科常规治疗和护理(对照组)对3组患者进行为期8周的干预.比较3组干预前后简易智能精神状态量表(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)评分、衰弱表型量表(frailty phenotype,FP)评分和 Berg 平衡量表(Berg balance scale,BBS)评分的差异.采用SPSS 22.0对数据进行重复测量方差分析.结果 (1)干预前后患者的MMSE评分在时间与组间上交互效应显著(F=69.929,P<0.05).VP组和ST组干预8周的MMSE得分均高于干预4周和干预前,干预4周的MMSE得分又均高于干预前(均P<0.05);在干预4周时,VP组的MMSE得分高于ST组和对照组(均P<0.05);在干预8周时,VP组的MMSE得分高于ST组和对照组,ST组的MMSE得分又高于对照组(均P<0.05).(2)干预前后患者的FP得分在时间与组间上交互效应显著(F=46.425,P<0.05).VP组干预8周[(2.64±0.59)分]的FP得分低于干预4周[(3.28±0.51)分]和干预前[(3.56±0.61)分],干预4周的FP得分低于干预前(均P<0.05);ST组干预8周[(3.44±0.56)分]的FP得分低于干预前[(3.59±0.56)分](P<0.05);在干预4周时,VP组的FP得分低于对照组[(3.36±0.54)分](P<0.05);在干预8周时,VP组的FP得分低于ST组和对照组[(3.39±0.55)分](均P<0.05).(3)干预前后患者的BBS得分在时间与组间上交互效应均显著(F=135.791,P<0.05).VP组和ST组干预8周的BBS得分均高于干预4周和干预前,干预4周的BBS得分又均高于干预前(均P<0.05);在干预4周时,VP组的BBS得分高于对照组(P<0.05);在干预8周时,VP组的BBS得分高于ST组和对照组,ST组的BBS得分又高于对照组(均P<0.05).结论 可变优先级认知-运动双任务训练可改善老年2型糖尿病认知衰弱患者的认知功能、身体衰弱程度以及平衡功能,且干预效果优于序贯式运动联合认知训练及常规治疗和护理.
Effects of variable priority cognitive-motor dual-task training in aged cognitive frailty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Objective To explore the effect of variable priority cognitive-motor dual-task training in aged cognitive frailty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods From September 2022 to September 2023,a total of 108 aged cognitive frailty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected in the Depart-ment of Endocrinology of North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital as research subjects.The subjects were divided into three groups in the order of admission,with 36 people in each group.Three groups of patients were intervened for 8 weeks using variable priority cognitive-motor dual-task training(VP group),exercise combined cognitive intervention with sequential task(ST group),and endocrinology routine treatment and nursing(control group),respectively.The scores of mini-mental state examination(MMSE),frailty phenotype(FP)and Berg balance scale(BBS)were compared among the three groups be-fore and after the intervention.Repeated measurement variance analysis was used to compare scale results by SPSS 22.0.Results(1)The MMSE score of patients before and after intervention had significant interac-tion effect between time and groups(F=69.929,P<0.05).The MMSE scores of the VP group and ST group after 8 weeks of intervention were higher than those before intervention and after 4 weeks of intervention,and the MMSE scores of the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention were also higher than those before interven-tion(all P<0.05).After 4 weeks and 8 weeks of intervention,the MMSE score of the VP group was higher than that of the ST group and the control group,and the MMSE score of the ST group was higher than that of the control group after 8 weeks of intervention(all P<0.05).(2)The FP score of patients before and after in-tervention had a significant interaction effect between time and groups(F=46.425,P<0.05).The FP score of the VP group at 8 weeks of intervention(2.64±0.59)was lower than that after 4 weeks of intervention(3.28±0.51)and before intervention(3.56±0.61),and the FP score after 4 weeks of intervention was lower than before intervention(all P<0.05).The FP score of the ST group after 8 weeks of intervention(3.44±0.56)was lower than before the intervention(3.59±0.56)(P<0.05);After 4 weeks of interven-tion,the FP score of the VP group was lower than that of the control group(3.36±0.54)(P<0.05).After 8 weeks of intervention,the FP score of the VP group was lower than that of the ST group and the control group(3.39±0.55)(both P<0.05).(3)The FP score of patients before and after intervention had a significant interaction effect between time and groups(F=135.791,P<0.05).The BBS scores of the VP group and ST group after 8 weeks of intervention were higher than those before and after 4 weeks of intervention,and the BBS scores after 4 weeks of intervention were also higher than those before intervention(all P<0.05).After 4 weeks of intervention,the BBS score of the VP group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).After 8 weeks of intervention,the BBS score of the VP group was higher than that of the ST group and the control group,and the BBS score of the ST group was also higher than that of the control group(all P<0.05).Conclusion The variable priority cognitive-motor dual-task training can improve the cognitive func-tion,physical frailty and balance function in aged cognitive frailty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,and the intervention effect is better than that of exercise combined cognitive intervention with sequential task and endocrinology routine treatment and nursing.

Type 2 diabetes mellitusCognitive frailtyDual taskVariable priorityAged

刘亚楠、王楠、赵颖、孙玉倩、李淑杏、魏剑芬

展开 >

华北理工大学护理与康复学院,唐山 063210

华北理工大学附属医院内分泌科,唐山 063210

2型糖尿病 认知衰弱 双任务 可变优先级 老年人

河北省社会科学基金

HB15SH020

2024

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中华医学会 济宁医学院

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.472
ISSN:1674-6554
年,卷(期):2024.33(7)
  • 15