首页|信息化促进基础教育公平的发展指数研究

信息化促进基础教育公平的发展指数研究

扫码查看
信息化是促进基础教育公平的重要手段,但目前还缺乏可操作的评估方案对其成效进行评估。对此,本研究首先从解析新时代教育公平的内涵入手,提出了可用于统计分析的操作性定义、勾勒了优弱势群体画像,并研制了信息化促进基础教育公平发展的评估模型,模型包括3个体现公平需求的一级范畴、13个技术可有所作为的二级维度和28个体现有质量之公平理念的三级指标。其次,通过德尔菲法和层次分析法探究模型各级指标的适切性和权重,形成了对应的评估指标体系,并构建了用于计算教育公平发展指数的数学模型,模型采用三元组(Q,IEI,IQEI)的指数形式以体现"优质"与"均衡"并重的新时代教育公平内涵。最后,通过分层抽样调查了我国东中西部8个省47个区县的126所学校,探明了信息化促进不同地区教育公平发展情况:第一,信息化促进不同地区的教育公平在"均衡"方面表现优异;第二,在"有质量的公平"上达到了一般水平,但还不尽如人意,特别是在"个性教学服务"上表现不佳;第三,历经新冠疫情一役,不同地区的学校都已能够很好地提供多通道应急学习保障,并事后与校内课堂教学无缝连接;第四,不同地区学生的数字访问差异虽然很小,但因学生在校可上网学习的设备单一,这类鸿沟并没有真正弥合。为改善现状,本研究提出各地区应重点维持条件保障、酌情发展个性服务、定期监测资源公平,三管齐下提升公平指数。
A Study on the K-12 Education Equity Development Index Promoted by Informatization
Informatization is an important means of promoting K-12 equity,but there is still a lack of op-erational measurement schemes to evaluate its effectiveness.In this regard,we start by analyzing the connota-tion of equity in education in the new era,put forward an operational definition that can be used for statistical analysis,and construct an evaluation model of K-12 equity development promoted by informatization.This model consists of 3 first-level categories reflecting educational equity demands,13 second-level dimensions in which technology can make a difference,and 28 third-level indicators embodying the concept of"equity with quali-ty".Afterward,the appropriateness and weight of the indicators at each level of the model are further explored through the Delphi method and hierarchical analysis,a corresponding measurement indicator system is formed,and a mathematical model for calculating the K-12 equity development index is constructed.This model adopts the index form of the triad(Q,IEI,IQEI)to reflect the ideas of education equity in the new era which empha-sizes the balance of"quality"and"equalization".Finally,the K-12 equity development promoted by informatiza-tion among different regions was explored through a stratified sample of 126 schools in 47 districts in eight provinces in east,middle,and west China.It is found that:1)The performance of informatization for"equaliza-tion"among different regions is excellent;2)The performance of informatization for"equity with quality"among different regions has reached an average level but not all is satisfactory,especially in"personalized teaching services",its performance is poor;3)After the COVID-19 epidemic,each region has become well equipped to provide multi-channel emergency learning coverage and seamlessly connect to in-school classroom teaching after the fact;4)Although the differences in digital access among different regions have been mini-mal,this type of divide has not been bridged because there is only a single device that allows students to learn online at school.To improve the status quo,we suggest each region should focus on the three-pronged ap-proach of maintaining achievements in basic conditions of education,developing equity in personalized teaching services as appropriate,and regularly monitor achievements of informatization in facilitating quality-oriented re-source support.

educational informatizationK-12 educationeducational equitydevelopment indexindicator sys-tem

彭红超、郑珊珊、高淑印、祝智庭、谢梦菲、陕昌群、钟丽霞、李永涛

展开 >

华东师范大学开放教育学院 上海 200062

华东师范大学教育信息技术学系 上海 200062

天津市教育科学研究院教育技术与信息化研究中心 天津 300191

河南省教育资源保障中心教育技术研究部 郑州 450004

成都市教育科学研究院教育大数据与监测评估研究所 成都 610036

广东第二师范学院 广州 510313

宁夏教育信息化管理中心 银川 750001

展开 >

教育信息化 基础教育 教育公平 发展指数 指标体系

2018年度国家社会科学基金重大项目

18ZDA335

2024

中国远程教育
中央广播电视大学

中国远程教育

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.094
ISSN:1009-458X
年,卷(期):2024.44(1)
  • 51