首页|DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较

DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较

扫码查看
采用灰色关联度分析法和DTOPSIS法对烤烟引进新品种进行了多性状的综合评判,研究结果表明:两种分析方法都能较全面的评判品种,但两种综合评价方法的评判结果存在一定的差异.在赋予了相同权重的情况下,灰色关联度方法品种间差异不大,DTOPSIS法评价结果中Ci值差异明显,能更好反映品种的优劣,在参试品种较多或需对参试品种归类或淘汰时,DTOPSIS法比灰色关联度法更加适用.
Application of DTOPSIS and grey relational analysis in evaluating newly introduced flue -cured tobacco varieties
Introduced flue - cured tobacco varieties were evaluated by DTOPSIS and gray relational analysis. Results showed that significant difference in evaluation existed in two methods. Given the same weight, grey relational analysis shows no significant differences among variet ies, while DTOPSIS has different results. It implied that DTOPSIS is more appropriate, especially when a large number of testing varieties were needed to be classified.

DTOPSISgrey relational analysisflue - cured tobaccovarietyevaluation

李彦平、李淑君、吴娟霞、孟智勇、郭芳阳

展开 >

河南省农业科学院烟草研究中心,河南许昌市学院北路461000

三门峡烟草公司灵宝市分公司,河南灵宝市车站路中段472500

DTOPSIS法 灰色关联度法 烤烟 综合评判

2012

中国烟草学报
中国烟草学会

中国烟草学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.182
ISSN:1004-5708
年,卷(期):2012.18(4)
  • 34
  • 10