首页|不同剂量瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导对气管插管全身麻醉腹部手术患者血流动力学水平及应激反应的影响

不同剂量瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导对气管插管全身麻醉腹部手术患者血流动力学水平及应激反应的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同剂量瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导对气管插管全身麻醉腹部手术患者血流动力学水平及应激反应的影响。方法 选取2019年8月至2021年5月河北省邯郸市中心医院、河北省邯郸明仁医院收治的120例行气管插管全身麻醉的腹部手术患者为研究对象,在组间基线特征可比的原则上,采用随机数字表法分为A组、B组、C组和D组,每组30例。A组患者给予0。2 mg/kg瑞马唑仑进行麻醉诱导,B组患者给予0。3 mg/kg瑞马唑仑进行麻醉诱导,C组患者给予0。4 mg/kg瑞马唑仑进行麻醉诱导,D组患者给予2。0 mg/kg丙泊酚进行麻醉诱导。比较分析四组患者麻醉诱导后的镇静效果、手术前后的血流动力学指标[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)]和应激反应指标[促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、一氧化氮(NO)]、围手术期不良反应发生情况。结果 B组、C组、D组患者麻醉诱导后的镇静有效率均高于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);而B组、C组、D组患者麻醉诱导后的镇静有效率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。术后2 d,D组患者的MAP均低于A组、B组和C组,HR均低于A组、B组,B组患者的ACTH、NO均低于A组和D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05)。D组患者的围手术期不良反应总发生率高于A组、B组和C组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0。05);而A组、B组和C组患者的围手术期不良反应总发生率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 0。3 mg/kg瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导在维持气管插管全身麻醉腹部手术患者血流动力学水平稳定的同时,可明显减轻患者的应激反应,且镇静效果和安全性较好,值得临床应用。
The effects of different doses of remimazolam on hemodynamic level and stress response in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia
Objective To investigate the effects of different doses of remimazolam on hemodynamic level and stress response in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.Method A total of 120 abdominal surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia with tracheal intubation admitted to Handan Central Hospital and Handan Mingren Hospital from August 2019 to May 2021 were selected as the study objects.They were divided into group A,group B,group C and group D by random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.Group A was given 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam for anesthesia induction,and group B was given 0.3 mg/kg remimazolam for anesthesia induction,and group C was given 0.4 mg/kg remimazolam for anesthesia induction,and group D was given 2.0 mg/kg propofol for anesthesia induction.The sedation effect after anesthesia induction,the hemodynamic indexes(MAP,HR),stress response indexes(ACTH,NO)before and after surgery,and perioperative adverse reactions in the four groups were compared and analyzed.Result The sedation effective rates of patients in group B,group C and group D after anesthesia induction were higher than those in group A,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the effective rates of sedation in group B,group C and group D after anesthesia induction(P>0.05).2 days after surgery,MAP in group D was lower than that in group A,group B and group C,and HR in group D was lower than that in group A and group B,and ACTH and NO in group B were lower than those in group A and group D,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The total incidence of perioperative adverse reactions in group D was higher than that in group A,group B and group C,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of perioperative adverse reactions in groups A,group B and group C(P>0.05).Conclusion 0.3 mg/kg remimazolam anesthesia induction can significantly reduce the stress response of patients undergoing abdominal surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation while maintaining the stable hemodynamic level,and has good sedation effect and safety,which is worthy of clinical application.

RemimazolamGeneral anesthesiaAbdominal surgeryHemodynamic levelStress response

刘志杰、陈永学、赵兴、高杨、李思远

展开 >

河北省邯郸市中心医院麻醉科,河北邯郸 056001

河北省邯郸明仁医院心血管科三病区,河北邯郸 056503

瑞马唑仑 全身麻醉 腹部手术 血流动力学 应激反应

河北省医学科学研究课题计划

20220519

2024

中国医刊
人民卫生出版社

中国医刊

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.14
ISSN:1008-1070
年,卷(期):2024.59(8)