首页|环泊酚复合羟考酮对内镜下胃黏膜剥离术老年患者的镇静效果

环泊酚复合羟考酮对内镜下胃黏膜剥离术老年患者的镇静效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨环泊酚复合羟考酮用于内镜下胃黏膜剥离术老年患者的安全性和有效性.方法 选取2022年3月至2022年12月北部战区总医院门诊204例拟行内镜下胃黏膜剥离术的老年患者为研究对象,性别不限,年龄60~75岁,体重指数18~30 kg/m2,ASA评分Ⅱ级或Ⅲ级,随机均分为丙泊酚组(P组)、环泊酚组(C组)、环泊酚+羟考酮组(CO组),每组68例.麻醉诱导时,P组静脉给予丙泊酚(1~1.5 mg/kg),C组给予环泊酚(0.2~0.5 mg/kg),CO组给予盐酸羟考酮(0.1~0.2 mg/kg)和环泊酚(0.2~0.5 mg/kg),3组药物注射时间均>30 s.麻醉维持时,C组和CO组均静脉持续泵注环泊酚[1~1.5 mg/(kg·h)],P组静脉持续泵注丙泊酚[2~5 mg/(kg·h)].麻醉诱导3 min后评估患者改良警觉/镇静评分,若评分≤1则开始内镜检查.记录3组患者T0(注射药物前)、T1(睫毛反射消失时)、T2(内镜检查开始时)、T3(退出内镜时)的平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR),血氧饱和度(SpO2),苏醒后30 min、1 h时VAS评分.记录诱导时间、苏醒时间、静脉注射痛、呼吸抑制等不良反应发生情况.结果 3组患者在T0、T3时MAP、HR及SpO2比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).在T1、T2时,与P组相比,C组、CO组患者MAP、HR和SpO2显著升高(均P<0.05);而CO组患者MAP、HR和SpO2略低于C组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与P组比较,C组和CO组呼吸抑制、注射痛发生率明显减少(均P<0.05),而C组和CO组比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).CO组患者苏醒后30 min、1 h的VAS评分,体动发生率均小于P组和C组(均P<0.05),而P组和C组比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 环泊酚复合羟考酮对内镜下胃黏膜剥离术老年患者镇静、镇痛效果确切;与单独使用丙泊酚或环泊酚比较,呼吸循环更平稳,不良反应更少,值得临床上推广应用.
Sedative effect of ciprofol combined with oxycodone on elderly patients undergoing endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection
Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of ciprofol combined with oxycodone in elderly patients who underwent endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection.Methods A total of 204 elderly patients in the outpatient department of the Northern Theater General Hospital who were to undergo endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection from March 2022 to December 2022 were selected as study participants.They were aged 60-75 years,with a body mass index of 18-30 kg/m2,and ASA grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ,regardless of sex.They were randomly divided into propofol(group P),ciprofol(group C),and ciprofol+oxycodone(group CO)groups,with 68 patients in each group.During anesthesia induction,group P was given propofol(1-1.5 mg/kg);group C,ciprofol(0.2-0.5 mg/kg);and group CO,oxyco-done hydrochloride(0.1-0.2 mg/kg)and ciprofol(0.2-0.5 mg/kg).The injection time of the three groups was>30 s.During anesthesia maintenance,ciprofol[1-1.5 mg/(kg·h)]was continuously injected intravenously in groups C and CO,and propofol[2-5 mg/(kg·h)]was continuously injected intravenously in group P.The modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation score was evaluated at 3 min after anesthesia induction.If the score was≤1,endoscopy was started.The mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),and blood oxygen saturation(SpO2)at times T0(before drug injection),T1(when eyelash reflex disappeared),T2(when endoscopy began),and T3(when endoscope was withdrawn);visual analogue scale(VAS)scores at 30 min and 1 h after resuscitation;and induction time,recovery time,intravenous pain,respiratory depression,and other adverse reactions were recorded in the three groups.Results There were no significant differences in MAP,HR,and SpO2 at T0 and T3 among the three groups(all P>0.05).At T1 and T2,compared with those in group P,MAP,HR,and SpO2 in groups C and CO were significantly increased(all P<0.05).MAP,HR,and SpO2 in the CO group were slightly lower than those in the C group;however,the differences were not statistically significant(all P>0.05).Compared with that in group P,the incidence of respiratory depression and injection pain in groups C and CO was significantly reduced(P<0.05),but there was no statistically significant difference between groups C and CO(P>0.05).The VAS score at 30 min and 1 h after awakening and inci-dence of body movement in the CO group were lower than those in the P and C groups(all P<0.05);however,there was no statistically significant difference between the P and C groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion Ciprofol combined with oxycodone had definite sedative and analgesic effects in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic gastric mucosal dissection.Compared with the use of propofol or ciprofol alone,with combination therapy,the respiratory cycle is more stable,patients have fewer adverse reactions,and it is worthy of clinical application.

ciprofol combination with oxycodoneendoscopic mucosal dissectionstomachelderly patient

张晓东、段鹏、孙莹杰、那琦

展开 >

湖北文理学院附属医院,襄阳市中心医院麻醉科,湖北 襄阳 441000

北部战区总医院麻醉科,沈阳 110016

环泊酚复合羟考酮 内镜下黏膜剥离术 老年患者

辽宁省应用基础研究计划

2023JH2/101300075

2024

中国医科大学学报
中国医科大学

中国医科大学学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.421
ISSN:0258-4646
年,卷(期):2024.53(5)
  • 8