Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy Between Parallel Double Incision and Transverse Incision in the Treatment of Axillary Malodor
Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of using parallel double incisions and transverse incisions in the treatment of underarm odor surgery.Methods A total of 80 patients with axillary odor who underwent surgical treatment in Putian Fude Hospitalwere randomly selected and divided into a control group(parallel double incision)and an observation group(transverse incision),and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Result The observation group had a shorter time for the disappearance of ecchymosis(5.30±1.25)days and healing(10.14±2.46)days compared to the control group[ecchymosis disappearance time(7.26±1.15)days and healing time(12.84±2.80)days](P＜0.05).In the observation group,there were 6 cases of subcutaneous ecchymosis(15.00％)and 1 case of incision rupture(2.50％),with no hematoma or infection observed,totaling 7 cases(17.50％),which was lower than the control group[11 cases of subcutaneous ecchymosis(27.50％),2 cases of hematoma(5.00％),2 cases of incision rupture(5.00％),and 1 case of infection(2.50％),totaling 16 cases(40.00％)](P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the effective rate of treatment between the observation group(92.50％)and the control group(90.00％)(P＞0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Both parallel double incisions and transverse incisions of the axillary fold can achieve good therapeutic effects,with a low postoperative recurrence rate and no significant difference.However,parallel double incisions have more complications,longer postoperative healing time,and slower recovery speed,which have a certain impact on the quality of life of patients after surgery.Therefore,it is recommended to prioritize choosing a transverse incision for surgery,as it has certain advantages in terms of complications and postoperative recovery speed.
万方数据
维普
