Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy and application value of different interventional therapy.Methods:A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with non-infectious knee joint effusion treated from March 2021 to December 2022 was conducted and randomly divided into three groups:experimental group,control group l,control group 2.The experimental group was treated with interventional therapy after ultrasonic positioning,the control group 1 was treated with real-time ultrasound guided interventional therapy,and the control group 2 were treated with blind aspiration and drug injection for knee joint effusion.The therapeutic effect of the three groups was compared.Results:The pumping accuracy of the 3 groups control group 1＞experimental group＞control group 2,the pumping accuracy of the experimental group and control group l compared with the control group 2,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05),and the pumping accuracy of the control group 1 was greater than that of the experimental group,but there was no statistical significance between the two groups(P＞0.05).After 4 weeks of treatment,VAS scores in experimental group and control group 1 were lower than those in control group 2,and Lysholm scores were higher than those in control group 2,with statistical significance(P＜0.05).Conclusion:The safety and effectiveness of real-time ultrasound guidance or positioning in the treatment of knee joint effusion are higher than that of body surface anatomical marker positioning puncture(blind penetration).Different ultrasound-guided interventional therapy can be selected according to the patient's knee joint effusion.
ultrasonic guidanceknee synovitiseffusion of knee jointinterventional therapy
维普
万方数据
