首页|宫颈癌患者在放射治疗中不同标记方式误差分析

宫颈癌患者在放射治疗中不同标记方式误差分析

扫码查看
目的:分析使用画线标记和纹身标记两种标记方式在宫颈癌调强放疗摆位精度上的差异,为临床决策提供参考.方法:选取2020年10月~2021年2月在本院放射治疗科接受加速器治疗的100例宫颈癌患者为研究对象,其中,50例患者使用体表纹身方式标记摆位点(体表纹身组),另外50例患者使用体表画线方式标记摆位点(体表画线组).所有患者在治疗前及之后每周一次治疗前拍摄0˚以及90˚射野验证片,将得到的数据与计划CT图像配准,获取患者头脚方向、左右方向和腹背方向的摆位误差以及患者不同标记方式摆位的中心点偏移次数.结果:体表纹身组头脚方向的摆位误差为(1.300±0.870)mm,小于画线组的(2.77±1.362)mm(P<0.01);左右方向的摆位误差为(1.230±0.983)mm,小于画线组的(2.160±1.220)mm(P<0.05);前后方向的摆位误差为(1.250±0.936)mm,小于画线组的(2.330±1.371)mm(P<0.01).体表画线组偏离摆位中心距离在3mm以上的次数所占百分比为98%.体表纹身组偏离摆位中心距离在3mm以上的次数所占百分比为31%,明显小于体表画线组.两组测量数据采用秩和检验,两组间比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:在体表纹身组中,头脚方向、左右方向和前后方向的摆位误差均显著小于体表画线组.此外,体表纹身组中偏离摆位中心距离在3mm以上的次数所占百分比明显小于体表画线组.因此在临床实践中可以考虑优先采用纹身标记方式进行宫颈癌的放射治疗.
Error Analysis of Different Labeling Methods in Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer
Objective:To analyze the difference of the positioning accuracy of intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)for cervical cancer using line marking and tattoo marking,so as to provide reference for clinical decision-making.Methods:100 patients with cervical cancer who received accelerator treatment in the radiotherapy department of our hospital from October 2020 to February 2021 were selected as the study subjects.Among them,50 patients used body surface tattoo to mark the placement site(body surface tattoo group),and 50 patients used body surface line drawing to mark the placement site(body surface line drawing group).All patients took 0˚ and 90˚ field verification films before treatment and once a week after treatment,registered the obtained data with the planned CT images,and obtained the positioning errors of the patient's head foot direction(LNG),left and right direction(LAT)and ventral dorsal direction(VRT).The number of times the center point of the patient is offset by different marking methods.Results:The head and foot positioning error in the tattoo group was(1.300±0.870)mm,which was smaller than that in the line drawing group(2.77±1.362)mm(P<0.01);The positioning error in the left and right directions was(1.230±0.983)mm,which was smaller than that in the line drawing group(2.160±1.220)mm(P<0.05);The positioning error of the front and rear directions was(1.250±0.936)mm,which was smaller than that of the line drawing group(2.330±1.371)mm(P<0.01).The percentage of deviations from the center of the positioning distance exceeding 3mm in the body surface line group is 98%.The percentage of deviations from the center of the positioning distance exceeding 3mm in the body tattoo group is 31%,significantly lower than that of the body surface line group.The measurement data of the two groups were tested by rank sum test,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the body surface tattoo group,the setup errors in the head-foot direction,left-right direction,and front-to-back direction were significantly smaller than those in the body surface line drawing group.In addition,the percentage of the number of times that the distance from the center of the setup was more than 3mm in the body surface tattoo group was significantly smaller than that of the body surface line drawing group.Therefore,in clinical practice,tattoo marking can be considered as a priority for cervical cancer radiotherapy.

cervical cancerradiotherapymarking methoderror analysis

刘万阳、许青、鲁晓腾

展开 >

复旦大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科,复旦大学上海医学院肿瘤学系 (上海 200032)

宫颈癌 放射治疗 标记方式 误差分析

2024

中国医疗器械信息
中国医疗器械行业协会

中国医疗器械信息

影响因子:0.375
ISSN:1006-6586
年,卷(期):2024.30(10)