首页|单孔与多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床应用比较

单孔与多孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床应用比较

Comparison of Clinical Application of Single-Hole and Multi-Hole Laparoscopic Hysteromyoma Removal

扫码查看
目的:探讨单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术的可行性及效果.方法:选取2020年7月~2022年7月本院的80例需要行子宫肌瘤剥除术的患者,随机分为单孔和多孔腹腔镜组,各40例.比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分(VAS评分)、术后住院时间及患者满意情况.结果:80台手术均顺利完成,单孔腹腔镜组患者手术时间、术中出血量与多孔腹腔镜组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但单孔腹腔镜组术后患者疼痛评分低、住院时间短、满意度增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组手术患者均无并发症.结论:单孔腹腔镜术不仅具有减轻术后疼痛,促进术后快速康复,而且切口美观隐匿,患者治疗满意.
Objective:To investigate the feasibility and effect of single-hole laparoscopic hysteromyoma removal.Methods:From July 2020 to July 2022,80 patients in our hospital who required hysteromyoma removal were selected and randomly divided into single-hole and porous laparoscope groups,40 cases in each group.Operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pain score(VAS score),postoperative hospital stay and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results:All 80 operations were successfully completed.There was no statistically significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of patients undergoing hysteromyoma removal under single-aperture laparoscopy compared with those in the porous laparoscopy group(P>0.05),but the postoperative pain score of patients in the single-aperture laparoscopy group was lower,the length of hospital stay was shorter,and satisfaction was increased,with statistical significance(P<0.05).There were no complications in both groups.Conclusion:Single-hole laparoscopy can not only reduce postoperative pain and promote rapid recovery after surgery,but also have beautiful hidden incision and satisfactory treatment.

single-hole laparoscopyporous laparoscopehysteromyoma removal

胡昕、余钢、罗文群、罗姚、金平亮

展开 >

江西省人民医院(南昌医学院第一附属医院)妇科(江西 南昌 330006)

单孔腹腔镜 多孔腹腔镜 子宫肌瘤剥除术

江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目

202130004

2024

中国医疗器械信息
中国医疗器械行业协会

中国医疗器械信息

影响因子:0.375
ISSN:1006-6586
年,卷(期):2024.30(14)
  • 4